Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anjal vs State of Kerala

Anjal vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 05, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1311006

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./1508/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anjal

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias tuesday, the 5th day of march 2024 / 15th phalguna, 1945 bail appl. no. 1508 of 2024 no crime with munambam police station, ernakulam petitioner/accused: anjal aged 19 years s/o baiju keettampilly house (ward 16) cherai, palliippuram village ernakulam district,, pin - 683514 by advs. vinu sasidharan k.anila (thiruvalla) respondent/state: state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, pin - other present: sr pp sri c s hrithwik this bail application having come up for admission on 05.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:o r d e rthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.2. the petitioner apprehends arrest by the munambam police station, ernakulam, in an unknown crime, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.3. heard; sri. vinu sasidharan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and sri.c.s.hrithwik, the learned public prosecutor appearing for the respondent.4. the learned public prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, as on today there is no case registered against the petitioner by the munambam police station, as alleged in the bail application. in the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. it is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by munambam police with regard tothe allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under section 41a of the code, if the offence alleged against him is punishable for less than seven years. sd/- c.s.dias judge shg

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 1508 OF 2024 NO CRIME WITH MUNAMBAM POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED: ANJAL AGED 19 YEARS S/O BAIJU KEETTAMPILLY HOUSE (WARD 16) CHERAI, PALLIIPPURAM VILLAGE ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,, PIN - 683514 BY ADVS. VINU SASIDHARAN K.ANILA (THIRUVALLA) RESPONDENT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - OTHER PRESENT: SR PP SRI C S HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Code’), for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest by the Munambam Police Station, Ernakulam, in an unknown crime, for allegedly committing a non-bailable offence.

3. Heard; Sri. Vinu Sasidharan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.C.S.Hrithwik, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, as on today there is no case registered against the petitioner by the Munambam Police Station, as alleged in the bail application. In the light of the above submission, the bail application is closed. It is made clear that, if the presence of the petitioner is required by Munambam police with regard to

the allegations made in the bail application, he shall be issued with a notice under Section 41A of the Code, if the offence alleged against him is punishable for less than seven years. Sd/- C.S.DIAS JUDGE shg

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial