Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Robin vs State of Kerala

Robin vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 19, 2024
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1310946

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/1749/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Robin

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....case is that the accusedpersons with an intention to assault the son of cw1, on 02.03.2014 at 12.am, trespassed into the compound of the house of cw1 and damaged her car. it is further alleged that they also destroyed the front door of the house and attempted to barge inside the house.3. according to the petitioners, thedispute has been settled with the defacto complainants/ respondent nos.2 and 3. both parties agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. therefore, they prayed for quashing all further proceedings in annexure a.4. the defacto complainants filedaffidavits endorsing the averments in the criminal mc. according to them, the case has been amicably settled and that they do not intend to proceed with the case and also that further proceedings in the case can be quashed. they have no further grievance against the petitioners.5. learned public prosecutor also stated that the dispute has been settled between the parties and hence further proceedings in the case can be quashed.6. considering the fact that the offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 452, 427 & 506(i) r/w 149 of ipc involved in this case are notheinous and very serious in nature, and the dispute has been settled between the petitioners and defacto complainants, this is a fit case in which further proceedings can be quashed. in the result, this crl. m.c is allowed. all further proceedings in cc. no.1904 of 2014 on the file of the judicial 1st class magistrate court-i, arising from crime no.439 of 2014 of chirayinkeezhu police station, is quashed. sd/- c.pratheep kumar, judge ssg appendix of crl.mc 1749/2024 petitioners’ annexures annexure-a certified copy of the final report in crime no.439/2014 of chirayinkeezhu police station. annexure-b affidavit executed by the 2nd respondent/cw1. annexure-c affidavit executed by the 3rd respondent/cw2.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 30TH CHAITHRA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 1749 OF 2024 CRIME NO.439/2014 OF CHIRAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CC NO.1904 OF 2014 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS - I,ATTINGAL PETITIONERS A1 TO A8:

1 ROBIN AGED 37 YEARS S/O. RAJAN JOHNI, HAPPY HOME, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL, 2 ROSHAN AGED 35 YEARS S/O. RAJAN JOHNI, HAPPY HOME, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL, 3 SUNIL AGED 40 YEARS S/O. ROJADAN, J.S. VILLA, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695 304 4 SAJAN AGED 34 YEARS S/O. SYRUS, THETTIMOOLAYIL HOUSE, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL, 5 AKHIL AGED 32 YEARS S/O. ALOSHIOUS, PUTHUVAL HOUSE, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL, 6 ANASU AGED 31 YEARS S/O. ALOSHIOUS, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL, CHIRAYINKEEZHU DESOM, SARKARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 695 304 7 JOHNI AGED 29 YEARS S/O. ROBIN, CIBI NIVAS, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL,

8 SHIBIN AGED 30 YEARS S/O. YESUDHAS, ST.MARY'S HOME, THEKKE AYARURUTHIYIL, BY ADV. SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENTS/STATE,CW1&CW2:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM., PIN - 682 031 2 SINDHU AGED 52 YEARS W/O. SUNILKUMAR, J.A. NIVAS, PUTHUKKARI DESOM, SARKARA VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 695 304 3 AKHIL AGED 29 YEARS S/O. SUNILKUMAR, J.A. NIVAS, PUTHUKKARI DESOM, SARKARA VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT., PIN - 695 304 BY ADV. SONAY JOHN

OTHER PRESENT: SRI.G.SUDHEER, P.P. THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J ----------------------------------------------- Crl. MC. No.1749 of 2024 ------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 19th day of April, 2024

O R D E R

This is a petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the rank of accused in Crime No.439 of 2014 of Chirayinkeezhu Police Station, which is pending as CC. No.1904 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial 1st Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal. The offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under Sections 143,147,148,447,452,427 & 506(i) r/w 149 of IPC.

2. The prosecution case is that the accused

persons with an intention to assault the son of CW1, on 02.03.2014 at 12.am, trespassed into the compound of the house of CW1 and damaged her car. It is further alleged that they also destroyed the front door of the house and attempted to barge inside the house.

3. According to the petitioners, the

dispute has been settled with the defacto complainants/ respondent Nos.2 and 3. Both parties agreed to drop all further proceedings relating to the above dispute. Therefore, they prayed for quashing all further proceedings in Annexure A.

4. The Defacto complainants filed

affidavits endorsing the averments in the Criminal MC. According to them, the case has been amicably settled and that they do not intend to proceed with the case and also that further proceedings in the case can be quashed. they have no further grievance against the petitioners.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor also stated that the dispute has been settled between the parties and hence further proceedings in the case can be quashed.

6. Considering the fact that the offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 452, 427 & 506

(i) r/w 149 of IPC involved in this case are not

heinous and very serious in nature, and the dispute has been settled between the petitioners and defacto complainants, this is a fit case in which further proceedings can be quashed. In the result, This Crl. M.C is allowed. All further proceedings in CC. No.1904 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial 1st Class Magistrate Court-I, arising from Crime No.439 of 2014 of Chirayinkeezhu Police Station, is quashed. Sd/- C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, JUDGE SSG APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 1749/2024 PETITIONERS’ ANNEXURES Annexure-A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRIME NO.439/2014 OF CHIRAYINKEEZHU POLICE STATION. Annexure-B AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT/CW1. Annexure-C AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/CW2.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial