Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ibrahim Cp vs Khader Shah

Ibrahim Cp vs Khader Shah

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 04, 2024
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1309532

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/465/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ibrahim Cp

Respondent

Khader Shah

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice murali purushothaman thursday, the 4th day of april 2024 / 15th chaithra, 1946 con.case(c) no. 465 of 2024 against the judgment dated in wp(c) no.4152 of 2023 of high court of kerala petitioner: ibrahim cp aged 45 years s/o. moidukutty choondampatta house, kottakkunnu porur, porur, malappuram, pin - 679339 by advs. k.c.eldho s.bijilal respondent: khader shah working as village officer, porur village, porur po, nilambur, pin - 679 339. by adv. sri. justin jacob, government pleader. this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 04.04.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: : 2 :judgmentthe learned government pleader submits that,pursuant to the directions in annexure a-1 judgmentdated 29.09.2023, an order has been passed by the respondent on 14.03.2024. recording the said submission, the contempt of court case is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the said order, if required. sd/- murali purushothaman judge srj : 3 : appendix of con.case(c) 465/2024 petitioner annexures annexure a1 the certified copy of the judgment in wp(c) no. 4152 of 2023 dated 29.09.2023 in this court. annexure a2 a true copy of the communication dated 04.11.2023 issued by the respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 465 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.4152 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: IBRAHIM CP AGED 45 YEARS S/O. MOIDUKUTTY CHOONDAMPATTA HOUSE, KOTTAKKUNNU PORUR, PORUR, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679339 BY ADVS. K.C.ELDHO S.BIJILAL RESPONDENT: KHADER SHAH WORKING AS VILLAGE OFFICER, PORUR VILLAGE, PORUR PO, NILAMBUR, PIN - 679 339. BY ADV. SRI. JUSTIN JACOB, GOVERNMENT PLEADER. THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: : 2 :

JUDGMENT

The learned Government Pleader submits that,

pursuant to the directions in Annexure A-1 judgment

dated 29.09.2023, an order has been passed by the respondent on 14.03.2024. Recording the said submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the said order, if required. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN JUDGE SRJ : 3 : APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 465/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 4152 OF 2023 DATED 29.09.2023 IN THIS COURT. Annexure A2 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 04.11.2023 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial