Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rijo, vs State of Kerala

RIJO, vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 01, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1309142

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/1511/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

RIJO,

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....petitioners are accused 1, 2 and 3 in crime no.1087 of 2023 of kuthiyathode police station, alappuzha, registered for the offences under sections 323, 324, 341 and 326 r/w section 34 of the indian penal code,1860. the 3rd respondent is the defacto complainant.3. according to the prosecution, the accused had on 25.12.2023 assaulted the defacto complainant and thereby committed the offences alleged.4. heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned public prosecutor.5. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that thematter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners ought to be quashed. it was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.6. in gian singh v. state of punjab and another [(2012) 10scc 303], the apex court has held that in appropriate cases, the high court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. this view was reiterated in narinder singh and others v. state of punjab and another [(2014) 6 scc 466] and yogendra yadav and others v. state of jharkhand and another [(2014) 9 scc 653].7. i have perused annexure-2 affidavit filed by the 3 rd respondent.the learned public prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto complainant stands by the contents thereof. i am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. there is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. the continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.8. accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in crimeno.1087 of 2023 of kuthiyathode police station, alappuzha are quashed. this crl.m.c is allowed as above. sd/- bechu kurian thomas, judge rkm appendix of crl.mc 1511/2024.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1945 CRIME NO.1087/2023 OF Kuthiyathode Police Station, Alappuzha PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1, 2 AND 3 : 1 RIJO, AGED 35 YEARS S/O. JACOB, CHONGANTHARA HOUSE, THURAVOOR PO,ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688532 2 LOOKACHAN @ LOOKA @ LUBIN PETER AGED 29 YEARS S/O. PETER,VALIYAVEETTIL HOUSE, THURAVOOR PO, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688532 3 ALBIN ANTONY AGED 31 YEARS S/O. ANTONY, VELIYIL KOODARAPPALLY, KUTHIATHODE, THURAVOOR PO, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688532 BY ADVS. ANOOP JOSEPH ZERENE LINDA MITCHEL ASWANI THUVVAKKADAN LIYA JOSE RESPONDENT/ STATE AND COMPLAINANT : 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KUTHIATHODE POLICE STATION, CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688533 3 RAHUL, AGED 28 YEARS S/O. MURALEEDHARAN, THANATT, KUTHIATHODE, THURAVOOR PO,CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688532 BY ADV SURESH BABU V.C. SRI. M.C. ASHI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Crl.M.C.No.1511 of 2024 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dated this the 1st day of March, 2024

ORDER

Petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash all proceedings against them.

2. Petitioners are accused 1, 2 and 3 in Crime No.1087 of 2023 of Kuthiyathode Police Station, Alappuzha, registered for the offences under Sections 323, 324, 341 and 326 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860. The 3rd respondent is the defacto complainant.

3. According to the prosecution, the accused had on 25.12.2023 assaulted the defacto complainant and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondent, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the

matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioners ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

6. In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10

SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

7. I have perused Annexure-2 affidavit filed by the 3 rd respondent.

The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavit is genuine, and the defacto complainant stands by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

8. Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioners in Crime

No.1087 of 2023 of Kuthiyathode Police Station, Alappuzha are quashed. This Crl.M.C is allowed as above. Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE RKM APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 1511/2024 PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES : Annexure 1 A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO. POLICE STATION Annexure 2 THE AFFIDAVIT DATED 07.02.2024 SIGNED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT EXPRESSING HIS NO OBJECTION TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE A1 FIR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial