Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hansel Roy vs Union of India

Hansel Roy vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 22, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1308900

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/34192/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hansel Roy

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. wednesday, the 22nd day of may 2024 / 1st jyaishta, 1946 wp(c) no. 34192 of 2017 petitioner: hansel roy,aged 14 years, represented by his father roy joseph, harshal villa, neduva p.o., parappanagadi, tirurangadi taluk, malappuram district. by advs. sri.t.v.george sri.jimmy george thadathil smt.linda george respondents: 1 union of india represented by the secretary to ministry of social justice and empowerment, central government secretariat, new delhi. 2 secretary to human resource development central government secretariat, new delhi. 3 state of kerala represented by the secretary to general education department, government secretariat, trivandrum. 4 secretary to health and family welfare department government secretariat, trivandrum. 5 addl.r5, director of public instructionsthiruvananthapuram -695001. [is impleaded as per orderdated 18/01/2018 in i.a. 414/2018] by advs.sri.suvin r.menon, cgc sri.suvin r.menon cgc other present: sri. venugopal v (gp) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 22.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c)no.34192/2017 2judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- gopinath p. judge acd w.p.(c)no.34192/2017 3 appendix of wp(c) 34192/2017 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the release published by the press information bureau, ministry of social justice and empowerment. exhibit p2 true copy of representation dtd 3-01-2017 preferred by the father of the petitioner before the 1st respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2024 / 1ST JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 34192 OF 2017 PETITIONER: HANSEL ROY,AGED 14 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER ROY JOSEPH, HARSHAL VILLA, NEDUVA P.O., PARAPPANAGADI, TIRURANGADI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.T.V.GEORGE SRI.JIMMY GEORGE THADATHIL SMT.LINDA GEORGE RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI. 2 SECRETARY TO HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI. 3 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 4 SECRETARY TO HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 5 ADDL.R5, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695001. [IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER

DATED 18/01/2018 IN I.A. 414/2018] BY ADVS.SRI.SUVIN R.MENON, CGC SRI.SUVIN R.MENON CGC OTHER PRESENT: SRI. VENUGOPAL V (GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)No.34192/2017 2

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.34192/2017 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 34192/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEASE PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS INFORMATION BUREAU, MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD 3-01-2017 PREFERRED BY THE FATHER OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial