Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sajid Mohammed vs Union of India

Sajid Mohammed vs Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 29, 2024
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1307667

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/5038/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sajid Mohammed

Respondent

Union of India

Excerpt

.....writ petition will require to be continued even in the afore manner; and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. :4: c. on the banks receiving the afore information/ intimation from the police authorities, they will adhere to the same and complete necessary action - either continuing the freeze for such period as mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be. d. if, however, no information or intimation is received by the banks in terms of directions (b) above, petitioners will be at full liberty to approach this court again; for which purpose, all their contentions in this writ petition are left open and reserved to them, to be impelled in future. sd/- devan ramachandran judge anm :5: appendix of wp(c) 5038/2024 petitioners' exhibits exhibit p1 a true copy of the notice received by the 8th respondent exhibit p2 a true copy of the transaction details made from 01-12-2022 to 05-09-2023 of the 1st petitioner's account exhibit p3 a true copy of the transaction details made from 01-02-2023 to 21-08-2023 of the 2nd petitioner's account exhibit p4 a true copy of the transaction details made from 01-12-2022 to 05-09-2023 of the 3rd petitioner's account respondents' exhibits - nil.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 5038 OF 2024 PETITIONERS:

1 SAJID MOHAMMED AGED 38 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED, KUNDAPPU HOUSE, KUMBALA P.O., ARIKADY, KASARGOD, KERALA, PIN - 671321 2 MAIMOONA AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.ABDUL RAHMAN AHMED KUNHI, GAREEB NAWAZ MANZIL, KUNNIL JUMA MASJID, UPPALA, KASARGOD, PIN - 671332 3 AYSHATH MIZNA A AGED 28 YEARS, D/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, GAREEB NAWAZ, MANZIL PALLAM, UPPALA P.O, KASARGOD, PIN - 671332 BY ADVS. T.S.SARATH MANU RAMACHANDRAN M.KIRANLAL R.RAJESH (VARKALA) SAMEER M NAIR JOTHISHA K.A. SAILAKSHMI MENON AASHI K. SHAJAN SMT.AKHILA B. BINU R.

RESPONDENTS: 1 UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001, REPRESENTED BY ITS HOME SECRETARY [email protected] 2 NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL REPRESENTED BY ITS NODAL CYBER CELL OFFICER, ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING, P S MANDIR MARG COMPLEX, MANDIR MARG, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 [email protected] :2:

3 INDIAN CYBERCRIME COORDINATION CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 5TH FLOOR, NDCC-II BUILDING, JAI SINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110001 [email protected] 4 STATE OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, 3RD FLOOR, DELHI SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI PIN - 110002, [email protected] 5 DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MSO BUILDING, INDRAPRASHTA MARG, IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI, DELHI, PIN - 110095 [email protected] 6 STATION HOUSE OFFICER CYBER POLICE STATION, COURT CHOWK ROAD, SAKET DISTRICT CENTER, SECTOR 6, PUSHP VIHAR, NEW DELHI, PIN - 110017 [email protected] 7 THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, RBI, BAKERY JUNCTION, NANDAVANAM, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695033 [email protected] 8 STATE BANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER KUMBALA BRANCH, SRI KRISHNA SOUDHA, NEAR DOCTORS HOSPITAL, BADIADKA ROAD, KASARGOD, PIN - 671321 9 SOUTH INDIAN BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, UPPALA, KAIKAMBA JUNCTION, KASARGOD, KERALA, PIN - 671324 BY ADVS. SRI.S.MANU SRI.SUNIL SHANKAR - SC

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :3:

JUDGMENT

It is without doubt, and as is unequivocally admitted by the parties, that the issues involved in this case have already been answered by this Court in Dr.Sajeer v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr. [2024 (1) KLT 826] and connected matters. In the afore circumstances, and since the learned counsel for the parties are ad idem as above, I allow this writ petition in terms of the afore judgment in the following manner: a. The respondent Banks, are directed to confine the

order of freeze against the accounts of the petitioners,

only to the extent of the amounts mentioned in the order/requisition issued to them by the Police Authorities. This shall be done forthwith, so as to enable the petitioners to deal with their accounts, and transact therein, beyond that limit. b. The respondent - Police Authorities concerned are hereby directed to inform the Banks as to whether the freezing of the accounts of the petitioners in this Writ Petition will require to be continued even in the afore manner; and if so, for what further time, within a period of eight months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. :4: c. On the Banks receiving the afore information/ intimation from the Police Authorities, they will adhere to the same and complete necessary action - either continuing the freeze for such period as mentioned therein; or withdrawing it, as the case may be. d. If, however, no information or intimation is received by the Banks in terms of directions (b) above, petitioners will be at full liberty to approach this Court again; for which purpose, all their contentions in this Writ Petition are left open and reserved to them, to be impelled in future. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE anm :5: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 5038/2024 PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE RECEIVED BY THE 8TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSACTION DETAILS MADE FROM 01-12-2022 TO 05-09-2023 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER'S ACCOUNT Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSACTION DETAILS MADE FROM 01-02-2023 TO 21-08-2023 OF THE 2ND PETITIONER'S ACCOUNT Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSACTION DETAILS MADE FROM 01-12-2022 TO 05-09-2023 OF THE 3RD PETITIONER'S ACCOUNT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS - NIL.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial