Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Wilson vs Amitha.D.O.

Wilson vs Amitha.D.O.

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 01, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1307591

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/385/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Wilson

Respondent

Amitha.D.O.

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh friday, the 1st day of march 2024 / 11th phalguna, 1945 con.case(c) no. 385 of 2024 against the judgment in wp(c) no.10681 of 2023 of high court of kerala petitioner/ wilson aged 74 years s/o thethus, sudha bhavan, kuzhiyar, vazhichal, kuttamala.p.o., thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695505 r.t.pradeep p.bijimon m.bindudas respondent/2nd respondent amitha.d.o. age and fathers name not known to the petitioner, secretary, ottasekharamangalam panchayat, ottasekharamangalam, ottasekharamangalam.p.o., thiruvananthapuram, pin - 695125 j.g.syamnath ajun krishna u.s.(k/869/2011) this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 01.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 1st day of march, 2024 standing counsel submits that pursuant to the directions contained in the judgment dated 04.08.2023 in w.p.(c) no.10681 of 2023, the respondent considered the matter and found that the goat farm is illegal. notice has been issued to the concerned person and the petitioner has been informed about this. recording the said submission, the contempt of court case is closed. sd/- n.nagaresh judge hmh appendix of con.case(c) 385/2024 petitioner annexures annexure i certified copy of judgment dated 4.8.2023 in w.p.(c) no.10681/2023 of the hon'ble high court of kerala

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 385 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.10681 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/ WILSON AGED 74 YEARS S/O THETHUS, SUDHA BHAVAN, KUZHIYAR, VAZHICHAL, KUTTAMALA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695505 R.T.PRADEEP P.BIJIMON M.BINDUDAS RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT AMITHA.D.O. AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY, OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM PANCHAYAT, OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM, OTTASEKHARAMANGALAM.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695125 J.G.SYAMNATH AJUN KRISHNA U.S.(K/869/2011) THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 1st day of March, 2024 Standing Counsel submits that pursuant to the directions contained in the judgment dated 04.08.2023 in W.P.(C) No.10681 of 2023, the respondent considered the matter and found that the Goat Farm is illegal. Notice has been issued to the concerned person and the petitioner has been informed about this. Recording the said submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed. Sd/- N.NAGARESH JUDGE hmh APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 385/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure I CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 4.8.2023 IN W.P.(C) NO.10681/2023 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial