Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1945 RP NO. 150 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.31084 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: WILLS AGED 43 YEARS S/O. WILSON, ARUMANOOR DESOM, ARUMANOOR DERBAVILA VEEDU, POOVAR VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - BY ADV V.G.ARUN (K/795/2004) RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 3 MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, 4 CHIEF ENGINEER KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, VASCOD JALA BHAVAN, VELLAYAMBALAM, 5 STELLA AGED 46 YEARS W/O. VINUKUMAR VARGHEES, JOTHIS HOUSE, VILAPPIL VILLAGE, KATTAKADA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695572 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.P. NO. 150 OF 2024 in W.P.(C.) No. 31084 OF 2023
ORDER
This review petition is filed seeking to review the judgment dated 26.10.2023 in W.P.(C.) No. 31084/2023.
2. I have heard Sri. V.G. Arun, the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, and Sri. P.M. Johny, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 4.
3. It appears that the grievance of the petitioner is that the address of the 4th respondent was wrongly stated in the writ petition.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the judgment was sent by registered post, and the same was returned as the address was incorrect. It is submitted that if the petitioner places the
judgment before the concerned respondent, necessary action shall be taken.
In that view of the matter, the review petition is closed. sd/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE DCS