Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pavithran vs State of Kerala

Pavithran vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 29, 2024
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1304695

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./730/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pavithran

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....kerala, pin - 690502 by sr pp sri c s hrithwik this bail application having come up for admission on 29.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:- dated this the 29th day of february,2024orderthe application is filed under section 438 of the code of criminal procedure,1973, for an order of pre- arrest bail.2. the petitioners are the accused 1 and 4 incrime no.1271/2023 of the kayamkulam police station, alappuzha, registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offences punishable under sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 506(i) and 308 r/w sec.149 of the indian penal code, 1860.3. when the bail application came up forconsideration on 08.02.2024, this court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioners to surrender before the investigating officer within seven days from the date of order and subject themselves for interrogation. -:3:-4. heard; sri.vishnu das, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and sri.c.s.hrithwik, the learned public prosecutor5. today, when the bail application was taken upfor hearing, the learned public prosecutor submitted that the petitioners had appeared before the investigating officer and their interrogation was completed on 15.2.2024. the petitioners’ further presence is not required. hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. the said submission is recorded. resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 08.02.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:(i) the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation and make themselves available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the investigating officer directs; -:4:-(ii) the petitioners shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;(iii) the petitioners shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.(iv) the petitioners shall not leave india without the.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 10TH PHALGUNA, BAIL APPL. NO. 730 OF 2024 CRIME NO.1271/2023 OF KAYAMKULAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 AND 4:

1 PAVITHRAN AGED 48 YEARS S/O. THANKACHAN, LAKSHMI BHVANAM, PUTHUPPALLY SOUTH MURI, PUTHUPPALLY P.O., KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 2 AKHIL PAVITHRAN AGED 24 YEARS S/O. PAVITHRAN, LAKSHMI BHVANAM, PUTHUPPALLY SOUTH MURI, PUTHUPPALLY P.O., KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK. ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - BY ADVS. VISHNU DAS SRUTHI DAS MAJESH P.B. MARIA NEETHU T.J ANAGHA A.S.

RESPONDENTS/STATE AND COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER KAYAMKULAM POLICE STATION, KAYAMKULAM, KERALA, PIN - 690502 BY SR PP SRI C S HRITHWIK THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:- Dated this the 29th day of February,2024

ORDER

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973, for an order of pre- arrest bail.

2. The petitioners are the accused 1 and 4 in

Crime No.1271/2023 of the Kayamkulam Police Station, Alappuzha, registered against the accused for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 506(i) and 308 r/w Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. When the bail application came up for

consideration on 08.02.2024, this Court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer within seven days from the date of order and subject themselves for interrogation. -:3:-

4. Heard; Sri.Vishnu Das, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri.C.S.Hrithwik, the learned Public Prosecutor

5. Today, when the bail application was taken up

for hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners had appeared before the Investigating Officer and their interrogation was completed on 15.2.2024. The petitioners’ further presence is not required. Hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. The said submission is recorded. Resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 08.02.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation and make themselves available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the Investigating Officer directs; -:4:-

(ii) The petitioners shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;

(iii) The petitioners shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.

(iv) The petitioners shall not leave India without the permission of the jurisdictional Court;

(v) In case of violation of any of the conditions

above, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.

(vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall also be filed before the court below.

(vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within

the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioners even while the petitioners are on -:5:- bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663]. Sd/- C.S.DIAS,JUDGE mtk/29.02.24 -:6:- APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 730/2024 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 THE CITIZEN COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT ALONG WITH THE FIRST INFORMATION STATEMENT IN CRIME NO.1271/2023 OF KAYAMKULAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT DATED 04.12.2023 ANNEXURE A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN CRL. M.P.NO. 6293/2023 OF THE HON'BLE COURT OF ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, ALAPPUZHA DATED 01.01.2024 ANNEXURE A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL DOCUMENT OF THE WIFE OF THE 1ST PETITIONER FROM PK KUNJU SAHIB MEMORIAL TALUK HOSPITAL, KAYAMKULAM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial