Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jasmi L. vs the District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs, Kozhikode,

Jasmi L. vs The District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs, Kozhikode,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 30, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1304499

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/3302/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jasmi L.

Respondent

The District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs, Kozhikode,

Excerpt

.....kodathikavala, cherthala p.o., alappuzha district, pin - 688524sri. m.k.sumod this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.01.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentit is with great regret that this court records that the recipient of the organ is now no more - as reported by her learned counsel.2. however - sri.m.k.sumod - learned standingcounsel for the 2nd respondent - hospital, submitted that, as much as his client wanted to schedule the surgery of the recipient of the organ and complete it well, it became impossible because she was unfortunately suffering from various diseases like gangrene, kidney failure, and high diabetes. he explained that, therefore, even if orders have been issued, the surgery of the recipient would have been impossible. the afore is recorded and this writ petition is thus closed. sd/- devan ramachandran sas judge appendix of wp(c) 3302/2024 petitioner’s exhibits: exhibit p1 the true copy of the certificate issued by the president of chathamangalam grama panchayath dated 23.01.2024 exhibit p2 the true copy of the affidavit of the petitioner dated 25.01.2024 exhibit p3 the true copy of the affidavit of the husband of the petitioner dated 25.01.2024 exhibit p4 the true copy of the affidavit of mr.v.t.abdurahiman, the patient dated 25.01.2024 exhibit p5 the true copy of form ii application of the petitioner and the patient dated 25.01.2024 exhibit p6 the true copy of form 3 application of the petitioner and patient dated 25.01.2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 10TH MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONER: JASMI L. AGED 33 YEARS W/O.SHANAVAS T., THANUVELLIKIZHAKKETHARA, PRAYAR SOUTH, ALUMPEEDIKA P.O., PUTHUPPALLY (PART), ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 690547 BY ADV C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL RESPONDENTS:

1 THE DISTRICT LEVEL AUTHORIZATION COMMITTEE FOR TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS, KOZHIKODE, GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOZHIKODE,REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN., PIN - 673008 2 THE CONVENER, LOCAL COMMITTEE OF ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, ASTER MIMS HOSPITAL, MINI BYE-PASS ROAD, GOVINDAPURAM, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN - 673016 3 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHERTHALA, DY.S.P.OFFICE, KODATHIKAVALA, CHERTHALA P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, PIN - 688524

SRI. M.K.SUMOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

It is with great regret that this Court records that the recipient of the organ is now no more - as reported by her learned counsel.

2. However - Sri.M.K.Sumod - learned Standing

Counsel for the 2nd respondent - hospital, submitted that, as much as his client wanted to schedule the surgery of the recipient of the organ and complete it well, it became impossible because she was unfortunately suffering from various diseases like gangrene, kidney failure, and high diabetes. He explained that, therefore, even if orders have been issued, the surgery of the recipient would have been impossible. The afore is recorded and this writ petition is thus closed. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN SAS JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3302/2024 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS: Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE PRESIDENT OF CHATHAMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 23.01.2024 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 25.01.2024 Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE HUSBAND OF THE PETITIONER DATED 25.01.2024 Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF MR.V.T.ABDURAHIMAN, THE PATIENT DATED 25.01.2024 Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF FORM II APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER AND THE PATIENT DATED 25.01.2024 Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF FORM 3 APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER AND PATIENT DATED 25.01.2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial