Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sachchidanand Modi Vs. State of Bihar

Sachchidanand Modi vs State of Bihar

Disposition Petition allowed Court Patna Decided Jan 04, 2002
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/130416

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Cri. Misc. No. 34966 of 2000
Subject
;Criminal
Disposition
Petition allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
;Criminal
Outcome / disposition
Petition allowed
Acts & sections
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 7; Bihar Trade Articles (Licensing Unification) Order, 1984

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sachchidanand Modi

Respondent

State of Bihar

Legal References

Acts
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 7; Bihar Trade Articles (Licensing Unification) Order, 1984

Excerpt

- shiva kirti singh, j.1. heard learned counsel for the 2002 petitioner and learned counsel for the state.2. petitioner seeks quashing of the entire criminal proceeding pending in the court of special judge, e.c. act jamui arising out of jamui p.s. case no. 77/99. the allegation against the petitioner is violating of section 7 of the e.g. act on the ground that on 8th june, 1999 from the godown of the petitioner 109 quintals of wheat and 1 quintals of sugar was recovered and the petitioner had no licence for trading in these articles.3. learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon annexure-2 an order of this court in another similar case where this court noticed that storage limit for wheat and rice has been abolished by a notification of the central government. details of such notification are also mentioned in another judgment of this court in the case of smt. kiran bala v. state of bihar 1996 (i) pat ljr 730.4. so far as sugar is concerned, it has been submitted that as per notification contained in notification number g.s.r. 10 dated 15-6-1995, only quantity exceeding five quintals of sugar will make the holder retail dealer for the purpose of bihar trade articles (licensing unification) order, 1984. on the basis of aforesaid submission it has rightly been submitted that petitioner was not required to hold any licence either for wheat or for sugar when the quantity of sugar is less than five quintals.5. in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer made in this writ application is allowed and the criminal prosecution against the petitioner is hereby quashed.

Full Judgment

Shiva Kirti Singh, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the 2002 petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks quashing of the entire criminal proceeding pending in the Court of Special Judge, E.C. Act Jamui arising out of Jamui P.S. Case No. 77/99. The allegation against the petitioner is violating of Section 7 of the E.G. Act on the ground that on 8th June, 1999 from the godown of the petitioner 109 quintals of wheat and 1 quintals of sugar was recovered and the petitioner had no licence for trading in these articles.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon Annexure-2 an order of this Court in another similar case where this Court noticed that storage limit for wheat and rice has been abolished by a notification of the Central Government. Details of such notification are also mentioned in another judgment of this Court in the case of Smt. Kiran Bala v. State of Bihar 1996 (i) Pat LJR 730.

4. So far as sugar is concerned, it has been submitted that as per notification contained in notification number G.S.R. 10 dated 15-6-1995, only quantity exceeding five quintals of sugar will make the holder retail dealer for the purpose of Bihar Trade Articles (Licensing Unification) Order, 1984. On the basis of aforesaid submission it has rightly been submitted that petitioner was not required to hold any licence either for wheat or for sugar when the quantity of sugar is less than five quintals.

5. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer made in this writ application is allowed and the criminal prosecution against the petitioner is hereby quashed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial