Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Corporate Manager vs State of Kerala

The Corporate Manager vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 12, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1304026

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/34093/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Corporate Manager

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. friday, the 12th day of april 2024 / 23rd chaithra, 1946 wp(c) no. 34093 of 2023 petitioner/s: the corporate manager aged 59 years marthoma & ea schools corporate management, scs campus, thiruvalla-. (lalykutty p., w/o james thomas, pookkattusseri house, karamoode po, kollam-689695)., pin - 689101s.subhash chand sruthi s. sekhar respondent/s: 1 state of kerala represented by the secretary to government, department of general education, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram- ., pin - 695001 2 the director of general education (formerly director of public instructions), jagathy, thiruvanathapurm-, pin - 695014 3 the deputy director (education), office of the deputy director (education), pathanamthitta at thiruvalla, pin - 689101 4 the district educational officer office of district educational officer, pathanamthitta,, pin - 689645 5 varghese a. joseph s/o a.k. joseph, high school teacher (maths), asram high school, perumbavoor, ernakulam - ., pin - 683542 varghese sabu v.john mani(k/421/2007) sethulakshmi k.k.(k/623/2017) meera rajan(k/1134/2021) vishal nair.a.(k/003321/2023) abhirami c. unni(k/2262/2023) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 12.04.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the writ petition is not pressed. submission is recorded. accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a judge rpk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 23RD CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 34093 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: THE CORPORATE MANAGER AGED 59 YEARS MARTHOMA & EA SCHOOLS CORPORATE MANAGEMENT, SCS CAMPUS, THIRUVALLA-. (LALYKUTTY P., W/O JAMES THOMAS, POOKKATTUSSERI HOUSE, KARAMOODE PO, KOLLAM-689695)., PIN - 689101

S.SUBHASH CHAND SRUTHI S. SEKHAR RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- ., PIN - 695001 2 THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION (FORMERLY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS), JAGATHY, THIRUVANATHAPURM-, PIN - 695014 3 THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION), OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION), PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA, PIN - 689101 4 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER OFFICE OF DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, PATHANAMTHITTA,, PIN - 689645 5 VARGHESE A. JOSEPH S/O A.K. JOSEPH, HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER (MATHS), ASRAM HIGH SCHOOL, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM - ., PIN - 683542 Varghese Sabu V.JOHN MANI(K/421/2007) SETHULAKSHMI K.K.(K/623/2017) MEERA RAJAN(K/1134/2021) VISHAL NAIR.A.(K/003321/2023) ABHIRAMI C. UNNI(K/2262/2023) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the writ petition is not pressed. Submission is recorded. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A JUDGE rpk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial