Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Cce Vs. R.K. Dutt Concerns

Cce vs R.K. Dutt Concerns

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Mar 09, 1998
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/13034

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Cce

Respondent

R.K. Dutt Concerns

Legal References

Reported In
(1998)(76)LC426Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. respondent is absent in spite of notice of hearing. there is no representation and no request for adjournment. we have heard shri m.ali, jdr appearing for the appellant-collector.2. respondent, engaged in the manufacture of goods covered by chapters 73, 84 and 90, was availing the benefit of ssi exemption notification no. 175/86, according to which total exemption was available for clearances up to the limit of rs. 30 lacs and subject to the above exemption goods falling under each of the chapters had individual limit of rs. 15 lacs. when the value of clearances of chapter 90 goods crossed rs. 15 lacs, the respondent started paying duty on further clearances of such goods. when the value of total clearances of all the goods covered by the three chapters crossed rs. 30 lacs, respondent started paying duty on further clearances. respondent subsequently filed refund claim stating that even though the value of total clearances exceeded rs. 30 lacs in so far as goods covered by chapters 73 and 84 were concerned, since the value of clearances of goods under each of the chapters had not exceeded rs. 15 lacs, the respondent was entitled to the benefit of exemption regarding such goods. assistant collector rejected the claim. however, the collector (appeals) held the refund claim admissible and allowed refund. the department being aggrieved has filed this appeal.3. a larger bench of the tribunal in ramakrishna engg. works has held that the limit of value of clearances of all the goods together would prevail over the limit prescribed for the goods falling under each chapter. in this view, the order passed by the collector (appeals) is set aside and the order passed by the assistant collector is restored.

Full Judgment

1. Respondent is absent in spite of notice of hearing. There is no representation and no request for adjournment. We have heard Shri M.Ali, JDR appearing for the appellant-Collector.

2. Respondent, engaged in the manufacture of goods covered by Chapters 73, 84 and 90, was availing the benefit of SSI exemption notification No. 175/86, according to which total exemption was available for clearances up to the limit of Rs. 30 lacs and subject to the above exemption goods falling under each of the Chapters had individual limit of Rs. 15 lacs. When the value of clearances of Chapter 90 goods crossed Rs. 15 lacs, the respondent started paying duty on further clearances of such goods. When the value of total clearances of all the goods covered by the three Chapters crossed Rs. 30 lacs, respondent started paying duty on further clearances. Respondent subsequently filed refund claim stating that even though the value of total clearances exceeded Rs. 30 lacs in so far as goods covered by Chapters 73 and 84 were concerned, since the value of clearances of goods under each of the Chapters had not exceeded Rs. 15 lacs, the respondent was entitled to the benefit of exemption regarding such goods. Assistant Collector rejected the claim. However, the Collector (Appeals) held the refund claim admissible and allowed refund. The Department being aggrieved has filed this appeal.

3. A Larger Bench of the Tribunal in Ramakrishna Engg. Works has held that the limit of value of clearances of all the goods together would prevail over the limit prescribed for the goods falling under each Chapter. In this view, the order passed by the Collector (Appeals) is set aside and the order passed by the Assistant Collector is restored.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial