Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kousallya vs Secretary

Kousallya vs Secretary

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 26, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1302367

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/25552/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kousallya

Respondent

Secretary

Excerpt

.....on 26.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: :2 :p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.--------------------------------------------- w.p.(c) no.25552 of 2014 ------------------------------------------------------ dated this the 26th day of february, 2024.judgmentthis writ petition is filed with the following prayers:1. issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order directing the 1st respondent to consider exhibit p3application within a reasonable time and as per law after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to be heard2. issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,order or direction directing the 1 st respondent to takefurther steps in exhibit p1 order as per law within a specific time frame. 3.such other reliefs which the honble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case.2. the main prayer is to implement ext.p1 order.:3 : ext.p1 is only a provisional order passed by the panchayat. if the final order is passed based on ext.p1, the petitioner can agitate the same separetely. with the above observation, this writ petition is closed. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan, judge smv :4 : appendix of wp(c) 25552/2014 petitioner’s exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the order of the ist respondent dated 21-04-2014 exhibit p2 true copy of the order in i.a no 632/14 in o.s 86/14 of munsiff court, kottarakkara exhibit p3 true copy of the representation dated 24-07-2014

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 25552 OF 2014 PETITIONER: KOUSALLYA AGED 86 YEARS D/O KOCHIKKA, SHOBHANA MANDIRAM, POOVATTOOR, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM SRI.B.DIPU SACH DEEV SRI.ARUN BABU RESPONDENTS: 1 SECRETARY KULAKKADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, MAVADY P.O, KULAKKADA 2 SHADEVAN AGED 50 YEARS S/O KUNJUPILLAI, CHAITHANYA NIVAS, POOVATTOOR MURI, KULAKKADA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA SRI.K.V.ANIL KUMAR FOR R1 SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN FOOR R2 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :2 :

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

--------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.25552 of 2014 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of February, 2024.

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

1. Issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,

order directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P3

application within a reasonable time and as per law after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to be heard

2. Issue writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ,

order or direction directing the 1 st respondent to take

further steps in Exhibit P1 Order as per law within a specific time frame. 3.Such other reliefs which the Honble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case.

2. The main prayer is to implement Ext.P1 order.

:3 : Ext.P1 is only a provisional order passed by the Panchayat. If the final order is passed based on Ext.P1, the petitioner can agitate the same separetely. With the above observation, this writ petition is closed. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JUDGE smv :4 : APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25552/2014 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 21-04-2014 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A NO 632/14 IN O.S 86/14 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTARAKKARA EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 24-07-2014

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial