Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sameer M. vs State of Kerala

Sameer M. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Aug 23, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1302331

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/32048/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sameer M.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....consideration before the 1 st respondent.3. after hearing both sides, i am inclined to dispose of thewrit petition with the following directions: the 1st respondent shall take appropriate decision on the request of the 2nd respondent for approval of sanction of amount on ext.p6 refund order, at the earliest, at any rate, within an outer w.p.(c). no.32048 of 2023 :3: limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment and on the basis of the approval order passed by the 1 strespondent, the amount shall be refunded to the petitioner within a further period of three weeks thereafter. with the above said direction, the writ petition is disposed of. sd/- viju abraham judge sm/ w.p.(c). no.32048 of 2023 :4: appendix of wp(c) 32048/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the land tax receipt dated village office exhibit p2 a true copy the application dated before the 3rd respondent exhibit p3 a true copy of order no. a3- the 3rd respondent exhibit p4 a true copy of the refund application dated 19/10/2022 submitted by the petitioner before the 3rd respondent exhibit p5 a true copy of the judgment dated c)no.34156/2022 exhibit p6 a true copy of the refund order dated exhibit p7 a true copy of g.o. (rt) no. 3191/2023/rd dated 03/09/2023 issued by the 1st respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 1ST AGRAHAYANA, WP(C) NO. 32048 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SAMEER M. AGED 47 YEARS S/O. MOIDEEN RAWTHER MAKKU, AASHIYANA, JANASAKHY ROAD, VELLOORKUNNAM P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, BY ADVS. RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW ANJANA S. RESPONDENTS:

1 STATE OF KERALA REP BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANTHAPURAM, PIN - 2 THE LAND REVENUE COMMISSIONER LAND REVENUE COMMISIONERATE, PUBLIC OFFICE BUILDING, MUSEUM ROAD, VIKHAS BHAVAN P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER R.D.O. OFFICE, GROUND FLOOR PATTIMATTOM- MUVATTUPUZHA ROAD, MUVATTUPUZHA (P.O.), 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER VILLAGE OFFICE, VELLOORKUNNAM, MUVATTUPUZHA PIN - 686669 5 THE SUB TREASURY OFFICER SUB TREASURY OFFICE MUVATTUPUZHA (P.O.),

OTHER PRESENT: GP - SYAMANTHAK B.S. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C). No.32048 of 2023 :2:

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

W.P.(C) No.32048 of 2023 Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2023

JUDGMENT

When the matter came up for consideration earlier, the learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that a decision regarding approval of the amount to be refunded is to be taken by the Government in view of the amount involved and sought time to get instructions in that regard.

2. When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the

learned Government Pleader upon instructions submitted that the 2nd respondent Land Revenue Commissioner has forwarded a request to the 1st respondent Government as per letter dated 09.01.2023 and the matter is pending consideration before the 1 st respondent.

3. After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the

writ petition with the following directions: The 1st respondent shall take appropriate decision on the request of the 2nd respondent for approval of sanction of amount on Ext.P6 refund order, at the earliest, at any rate, within an outer W.P.(C). No.32048 of 2023 :3: limit of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment and on the basis of the approval order passed by the 1 st

respondent, the amount shall be refunded to the petitioner within a further period of three weeks thereafter. With the above said direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/ W.P.(C). No.32048 of 2023 :4: APPENDIX OF WP(C) 32048/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED VILLAGE OFFICE Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY THE APPLICATION DATED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. A3- THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND APPLICATION DATED 19/10/2022 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED C)NO.34156/2022 Exhibit P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REFUND ORDER DATED Exhibit P7 A TRUE COPY OF G.O. (RT) NO. 3191/2023/RD DATED 03/09/2023 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial