Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fathima vs State of Kerala

Fathima vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 14, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1302226

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/6209/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fathima

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice bechu kurian thomas thursday, the 14th day of march 2024 / 24th phalguna, 1945 crl.mc no. 6209 of 2021 crime no.1974/2021 of perumbavoor police station, ernakulampetitioners/accused: 1 fathima aged 76 years w/o late ibrahim, 2 aisha aged 57 years 3 m e jabbar aged 50 years 4 zeenath aged 44 years 5 mujeeb m e. aged 42 years -:2:- 6 najeeb m.e. aged 40 years 7 jaseena m e. aged 38 years by adv maitheen m.pareeth respondents/state & defacto complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam-682031. 2 station house officer perumbavoor police station, ernakulam-683542. 3 the tahsildar (land records) land line, kunnathunad, perumbavoor, ernakulam-683561. by adv. noushad k.a, public prosecutor this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 14.03.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: -:3:-bechu kurian thomas, j.dated this the 14th day of march, 2024orderpetitioners challenge the registration of fir in crime no.1974/2021 of perumbavoor police station.2. it is now submitted that, pursuant to the said crime, investigation has been completed and a final report was filed.3. in view of the filing of the final report in crime no.1974/2021 ofperumbavoor police station, petitioners are given the liberty to challenge the said final report. accordingly, reserving the liberty of the petitioners to initiate appropriate challenge against the final report, this criminal miscellaneous case is dismissed as withdrawn, sd/- bechu kurian thomas judge jka/14.03.24.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 6209 OF 2021 CRIME NO.1974/2021 OF PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: 1 FATHIMA AGED 76 YEARS W/O LATE IBRAHIM, 2 AISHA AGED 57 YEARS 3 M E JABBAR AGED 50 YEARS 4 ZEENATH AGED 44 YEARS 5 MUJEEB M E. AGED 42 YEARS -:2:- 6 NAJEEB M.E. AGED 40 YEARS 7 JASEENA M E. AGED 38 YEARS BY ADV MAITHEEN M.PAREETH RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031. 2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER PERUMBAVOOR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM-683542. 3 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS) LAND LINE, KUNNATHUNAD, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM-683561. BY ADV. NOUSHAD K.A, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: -:3:-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.

Dated this the 14th day of March, 2024

ORDER

Petitioners challenge the registration of FIR in Crime No.1974/2021 of Perumbavoor Police Station.

2. It is now submitted that, pursuant to the said crime, investigation has been completed and a final report was filed.

3. In view of the filing of the final report in Crime No.1974/2021 of

Perumbavoor Police Station, petitioners are given the liberty to challenge the said final report. Accordingly, reserving the liberty of the petitioners to initiate appropriate challenge against the final report, this criminal miscellaneous case is dismissed as withdrawn, Sd/- BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE Jka/14.03.24.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial