Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mni, vs Sudhakaran,

MNI, vs Sudhakaran,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 30, 2024
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1301251

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/783/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MNI,

Respondent

Sudhakaran,

Excerpt

.....years 27 prabitha, 28 pratheesh, 29 sindhu, aged 52 years 30 raghu, aged 82 years 31 sethu, aged 79 years s/o. samikutty, karthika nivas, elathur village, puthur desom, p.o. eranhikkal, kozhikode taluk, pin- 673303. 32 sivadasan, aged 77 years 33 pavithran, aged 67 years 34 kamalakshi, aged 96 years rsa no. 783 of 2021 5w/o. samikutty, kuppakalathil, elathur amsom desom, 35 nalini, aged 79 years w/o. viswanathan, kuppakalathil, elathur amsom desom, 36 prasad, aged 61 years s/o. viswanathan, kuppakalathil, elathur amsom desom, 37 prameela, aged 59 years d/o. viswanathan, kuppakalathil, elathur amsom desom, 38 sasankan, aged 55 years s/o. viswanathan, kuppakalathil, elathur amsom desom, 39 sushama, aged 53 years d/o. viswanathan, kuppakalathil, elathur amsom desom, by advs. v.v.surendran p.a.harishthis regular second appeal having come up for orders on 30.01.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa no. 783 of 2021 6judgmentdated this the 30th day of january, 2024 in this matter, as per order, dated 11.7.2023, this court specifically directed the appellants to implead the legal representatives of deceased respondents 2 and 15. but, no steps taken so far.2. when this matter came up for consideration last time, there was no representation for the appellants. hence, this regular second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- a. badharudeen judge bb

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 10TH MAGHA, 1945 RSA NO. 783 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN A.S.NO.91/2020 OF DISTRICT COURT,KOZHIKODE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S.NO.457/2015 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT -I, KOZHIKODE APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS: 1 MINI, AGED 51 YEARS D/O. SUDHAKARAN, RESIDING AT KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM 2 SHAJI, S/O. SUDHAKARAN, RESIDING AT KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM BY ADVS. C.BHASKARAN ASADU AHMMED CHULLINTE(K/001377/2018) ARJUN C BHASKAR(K/001636/2020) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 SUDHAKARAN, AGED 78 YEARS, S/O. PAITHAL, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM 2 JANARDHANAN, AGED 74 YEARS 3 ASOKAN, AGED 66 YEARS 4 RAMANI, AGED 64 YEARS RSA NO. 783 OF 2021 2

5 USHA, AGED 62 YEARS 6 SUGANDHI, 7 JAYAKRISHNAN, 8 DEVAYANI, W/O.SASI, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, P.O. 9 SHYLESH, AGED 40 YEARS S/O.SASI, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, P.O. 10 SHAJITH, AGED 38 YEARS S/O.SASI, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, P.O. 11 SEEMA, AGED 36 YEARS D/O.SASI, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, P.O. 12 SREEDHARI, AGED 80 YEARS W/O. SEKHARAN, GURIKKALAVIDE, KOORIYAD P.O., VADAKARA 13 SEETHALA, D/O. SEKHARAN, GURIKKALAVIDE, KOORIYAD P.O., VADAKARA 14 SUBASH,

RSA NO. 783 OF 2021 3

15 MADHU, 16 ANIL, AGED 52 YEARS 17 PRAMOD, AGED 50 YEARS 18 JYOTHI, D/O. SEKHARAN, GURIKKALAVIDE, KOORIYAD P.O., VADAKARA 19 SAVITHRI, AGED 71 YEARS W/O. GANGADHARAN KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 20 PRASANTHAN, S/O. GANGADHARAN KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 21 PRAJULA, AGED 42 YEARS S/O. GANGADHARAN KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 22 PRASEETHA, AGED 40 YEARS D/O. GANGADHARAN KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 23 PRASANNA, AGED 66 YEARS 24 BABU, AGED 62 YEARS

RSA NO. 783 OF 2021 4 25 RAMAKRISHNAN, 26 DINESHAN, AGED 58 YEARS 27 PRABITHA, 28 PRATHEESH, 29 SINDHU, AGED 52 YEARS 30 RAGHU, AGED 82 YEARS 31 SETHU, AGED 79 YEARS S/O. SAMIKUTTY, KARTHIKA NIVAS, ELATHUR VILLAGE, PUTHUR DESOM, P.O. ERANHIKKAL, KOZHIKODE TALUK, PIN- 673303. 32 SIVADASAN, AGED 77 YEARS 33 PAVITHRAN, AGED 67 YEARS 34 KAMALAKSHI, AGED 96 YEARS RSA NO. 783 OF 2021 5

W/O. SAMIKUTTY, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 35 NALINI, AGED 79 YEARS W/O. VISWANATHAN, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 36 PRASAD, AGED 61 YEARS S/O. VISWANATHAN, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 37 PRAMEELA, AGED 59 YEARS D/O. VISWANATHAN, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 38 SASANKAN, AGED 55 YEARS S/O. VISWANATHAN, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, 39 SUSHAMA, AGED 53 YEARS D/O. VISWANATHAN, KUPPAKALATHIL, ELATHUR AMSOM DESOM, BY ADVS. V.V.SURENDRAN P.A.HARISH

THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 30.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA NO. 783 OF 2021 6

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 30th day of January, 2024 In this matter, as per order, dated 11.7.2023, this Court specifically directed the appellants to implead the legal representatives of deceased respondents 2 and 15. But, no steps taken so far.

2. When this matter came up for consideration last time, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, this Regular Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE Bb

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial