Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunil vs the State of Kerala

SUNIL vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 05, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1300530

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/19156/2014

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SUNIL

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. friday, the 5th day of january 2024 / 15th pousha, 1945 petitioners: 1 g.sunil, then sub inspector of police, now sho, kollam police station, quilon. 2 k.k.biju, then principal sub inspector of police, now ci of police, nallalam, kozhikode. by advs. sri.manjeri sunderraj smt.k.anila respondents: 1 the state of kerala, represented by the secretary to government of kerala, home (a) department, secretariat, trivandrum. 2 the member (khrc), kerala state human rights commission, trivandrum. 3 addl r3: e.rahul, 23 years, s/o.e.vijayakumar, ‘kalithara’, nadakkavu, kozhikode, pin - 673 011. addl.r3 is impleaded as per order dated 11.08.2014 in i.a.no.10819/2014. sri. justine jacob (sr gp) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 05.01.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthis writ petition was admitted and notice was issued to the additional 3rd respondent (beneficiary of the impugned order) on 11.08.2014. the registry reports that even today, process has not been filed for issuance of notice to the additional 3 rd respondent and therefore, notice to the additional 3rd respondent has not been sent and service is not complete. when the matter is called out today, there is no representation for the petitioners. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- gopinath p. judge dk appendix of wp(c) 19156/2014 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1: true copy of the torder dt.01.11.2012 by 2nd respondent member khrc exhibit p2: true copy of forensic report dated 14.09.2010 exhibit p3: true copy of medical records relating to 2nd respondent rahul.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 15TH POUSHA, 1945 PETITIONERS: 1 G.SUNIL, THEN SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NOW SHO, KOLLAM POLICE STATION, QUILON. 2 K.K.BIJU, THEN PRINCIPAL SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NOW CI OF POLICE, NALLALAM, KOZHIKODE. BY ADVS. SRI.MANJERI SUNDERRAJ SMT.K.ANILA RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, HOME (A) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM. 2 THE MEMBER (KHRC), KERALA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, TRIVANDRUM. 3 ADDL R3: E.RAHUL, 23 YEARS, S/O.E.VIJAYAKUMAR, ‘KALITHARA’, NADAKKAVU, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 011. ADDL.R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 11.08.2014 IN I.A.NO.10819/2014. SRI. JUSTINE JACOB (SR GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This writ petition was admitted and notice was issued to the additional 3rd respondent (beneficiary of the impugned order) on 11.08.2014. The Registry reports that even today, process has not been filed for issuance of notice to the additional 3 rd respondent and therefore, notice to the additional 3rd respondent has not been sent and service is not complete. When the matter is called out today, there is no representation for the petitioners. Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19156/2014 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE TORDER DT.01.11.2012 BY 2ND RESPONDENT MEMBER KHRC EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF FORENSIC REPORT DATED 14.09.2010 EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF MEDICAL RECORDS RELATING TO 2ND RESPONDENT RAHUL.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial