Sujila vs Unnikkuttan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 12, 2024

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1300491

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1300491
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V,Honourable Mr. Justice P.M.Manoj
Decided On: Apr 12, 2024
Case Number: Mat.Appeal/658/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sujila

Respondent

Unnikkuttan

Excerpt

& mat.appeal no. 658 of 2021 op no.498 of 2015 of family court, ottappalam appellant/petitioner: aged 44 years, d/o. sankaranarayana gupthan, ambalath veedu, kulappadam post, kumaramputhur vazhi, mannarkkad taluk, palakkad dist- 678 593 respondents/respondents: 1 unnikkuttan aged 50 years,s/o. kunju gupthan, pothiyedath veedu, vazhemburam post, 2 kunjugupthan aged 81 years, s/o. kuttagupthan, residing at pothiyedath veedu, vazhemburam post,sri p jayaram, for party resp. hearing on 12.04.2024, along with mat.appeal.661/2021, the & mat.appeal no. 661 of 2021 op no.235 of 2016 of family court, ottappalam appellant/respondent: aged 44 years d/o. sankarananrayana gupthan, ambalathu veedu, kulappadam post, mannarkkad taluk, palakkad district-678 583 respondent/petitioner: unnikuttan aged 50 years s/o. kunhu gupthan, pothiyodathu veedu, vazhamburam post, karakurussi amsom, mannarkkad taluk, palakkad district-678 633 by adv rajesh sivaramankutty hearing on 12.04.2024, along with mat.appeal.658/2021, thejudgmentraja vijayaraghavan, j.when these matters are taken up, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the reliefs sought have become infructuous and requests that these petitions be dismissed as not pressed. in view of the said submission, these petitions are dismissed as not pressed. raja vijayaraghavan v p.m.manoj iap

Full Judgment

& MAT.APPEAL NO. 658 OF 2021 OP NO.498 OF 2015 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER: AGED 44 YEARS, D/O. SANKARANARAYANA GUPTHAN, AMBALATH VEEDU, KULAPPADAM POST, KUMARAMPUTHUR VAZHI, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DIST- 678 593 RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 UNNIKKUTTAN AGED 50 YEARS,S/O. KUNJU GUPTHAN, POTHIYEDATH VEEDU, VAZHEMBURAM POST, 2 KUNJUGUPTHAN AGED 81 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAGUPTHAN, RESIDING AT POTHIYEDATH VEEDU, VAZHEMBURAM POST,

SRI P JAYARAM, FOR PARTY RESP. HEARING ON 12.04.2024, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.661/2021, THE & MAT.APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2021 OP NO.235 OF 2016 OF FAMILY COURT, OTTAPPALAM APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: AGED 44 YEARS D/O. SANKARANANRAYANA GUPTHAN, AMBALATHU VEEDU, KULAPPADAM POST, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 583 RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: UNNIKUTTAN AGED 50 YEARS S/O. KUNHU GUPTHAN, POTHIYODATHU VEEDU, VAZHAMBURAM POST, KARAKURUSSI AMSOM, MANNARKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 633 BY ADV RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY HEARING ON 12.04.2024, ALONG WITH Mat.Appeal.658/2021, THE

JUDGMENT

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

When these matters are taken up, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the reliefs sought have become infructuous and requests that these petitions be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the said submission, these petitions are dismissed as not pressed. RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V P.M.MANOJ IAP

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties Sujila vs Unnikkuttan Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Raja Vijayaraghavan V,Honourable Mr. J...