Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Aleem vs Additional Tahsildar

Abdul Aleem vs Additional Tahsildar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jun 12, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1300064

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/15740/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Aleem

Respondent

Additional Tahsildar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan wednesday, the 12th day of june 2024 / 22nd jyaishta, 1946 wp(c) no. 15740 of 2016 petitioner: abdul aleem, aged 57 years, s/o.abdul kareem ravuthar & amina umma, pallimettu, athikottu po, nalleppilly, palakkad district, pin 678 554. by adv sri.p.sathisan respondents:1 additional tahsildar palakkad taluk office, palakkad -678 001. 2 village officer elappully village ii, village office, elappully po, palakkad -678 622. 3 local level monitoring committee, elappully-ii village, represented by its convenor, agricultural officer, krishi bhavan, elappully p.o., palakkad-678622 is impleaded as addl.r3 as per order dtd.06.06.2016 in ia 6657/2016 4 additional district magistrate, office of the adm, civil station, palakkad-678001 is impleaded as addl.r4 as per order dtd.02.09.2016 in ia 5 sri.s.vijayan, additional district magistrate, office of the additional district magistrate,civil station, palakkad-678001 is suomotu impleaded as addl.r5 as per orderdtd.30.11.2016 other present: sri.b.s.syamantak, gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 12.06.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p(c).15740/2016p. v. kunhikrishnan, j.w.p(c).no.15740 of 2016 dated this the 12th day of june, 2024judgmentwhen this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that, even though he has sent a letter to the party, there is no response. if that is the case, this writ petition need not be retained here. therefore, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p. v. kunhikrishnan judge sbna/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 15740 OF 2016 PETITIONER: ABDUL ALEEM, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL KAREEM RAVUTHAR & AMINA UMMA, PALLIMETTU, ATHIKOTTU PO, NALLEPPILLY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN 678 554. BY ADV SRI.P.SATHISAN RESPONDENTS:

1 ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR PALAKKAD TALUK OFFICE, PALAKKAD -678 001. 2 VILLAGE OFFICER ELAPPULLY VILLAGE II, VILLAGE OFFICE, ELAPPULLY PO, PALAKKAD -678 622. 3 LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, ELAPPULLY-II VILLAGE, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, ELAPPULLY P.O., PALAKKAD-678622 IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R3 AS PER ORDER DTD.06.06.2016 IN IA 6657/2016 4 ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, OFFICE OF THE ADM, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD-678001 IS IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R4 AS PER ORDER DTD.02.09.2016 IN IA 5 SRI.S.VIJAYAN, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, OFFICE OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD-678001 IS SUO

MOTU IMPLEADED AS ADDL.R5 AS PER ORDER

DTD.30.11.2016 OTHER PRESENT: SRI.B.S.SYAMANTAK, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.06.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P(C).15740/2016

P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

W.P(C).No.15740 of 2016 Dated this the 12th day of June, 2024

JUDGMENT

When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the counsel for the petitioner submitted that, even though he has sent a letter to the party, there is no response. If that is the case, this Writ Petition need not be retained here. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE Sbna/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial