Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Nisha Ashok, vs Union Bank of India, Represented by Authorized Officer,

Nisha Ashok, vs Union Bank of India, Represented by Authorized Officer,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Aug 02, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1299623

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/28080/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nisha Ashok,

Respondent

Union Bank of India, Represented by Authorized Officer,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh friday, the 2nd day of august 2024 / 11th sravana, 1946 wp(c) no. 28080 of 2023 petitioner: nisha ashok, aged 42 years, w/o. ashok kumar gopalan, narimattathil house, kulasekharamanagalam p. o., vaikom, pin - 686608. by adv. smt. e. v. moly respondents: union bank of india, represented by authorized officer, regional office, kottayam - 3rd floor, amala towers, adichira junction, kottayam kerala - 686630. by advs. sri. a. s. p. kurup sri. sadchith p. kurup sri. c. p. anil raj sri. siva suresh smt. reshma raj this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 02.08.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:dinesh kumar singh, j.-------------------------- w.p.(c) no. 28080 of 2023 ------------------------- dated this the 2nd day of august, 2024judgment1. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, he would like to withdraw the writ petition and take recourse to any other statutory remedy as may be available to him under the law.2. considering the above submission of the learned counsel forthe petitioner, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. sd/- dinesh kumar singh judge svn appendix of wp(c) 28080/2023 petitioner’s exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of the judgment dated 19.12.2022 in wpc.no.14523 /2022 of high court of keralaexhibit p2 the true copy of the receipt dated 20.12.2022 for payment of rs.75,000/- exhibit p3 the true copy of the representation dated 16.6.2023 exhibit p4 the true copy of the notice dated 27.07.2023 issued by advocate commissioner exhibit p5 the true copy of the representation dated 22- 10-2023 submitted to the minister exhibit p6 the true copy of the letter dated 2-11-2023 issued by college principal

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2024 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 28080 OF 2023 PETITIONER: NISHA ASHOK, AGED 42 YEARS, W/O. ASHOK KUMAR GOPALAN, NARIMATTATHIL HOUSE, KULASEKHARAMANAGALAM P. O., VAIKOM, PIN - 686608. BY ADV. SMT. E. V. MOLY RESPONDENTS: UNION BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER, REGIONAL OFFICE, KOTTAYAM - 3RD FLOOR, AMALA TOWERS, ADICHIRA JUNCTION, KOTTAYAM KERALA - 686630. BY ADVS. SRI. A. S. P. KURUP SRI. SADCHITH P. KURUP SRI. C. P. ANIL RAJ SRI. SIVA SURESH SMT. RESHMA RAJ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.08.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.

-------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 28080 of 2023 ------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of August, 2024

JUDGMENT

1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that, he would like to withdraw the writ petition and take recourse to any other statutory remedy as may be available to him under the law.

2. Considering the above submission of the learned Counsel for

the petitioner, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE Svn APPENDIX OF WP(C) 28080/2023 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.12.2022 IN WPC.NO.14523 /2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 20.12.2022 FOR PAYMENT OF RS.75,000/- EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16.6.2023 EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 27.07.2023 ISSUED BY ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22- 10-2023 SUBMITTED TO THE MINISTER EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 2-11-2023 ISSUED BY COLLEGE PRINCIPAL

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties Nisha Ashok, vs Union Bank of India, Represented by Authorize... Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice D. K. Singh

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales