Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Infant Thomas vs State of Kerala

Infant Thomas vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 26, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1298557

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/10161/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Infant Thomas

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....idukki, kuyilumala- 685 603. 3 the executive engineer district panchayath, painavu, idukki kuyilumala - 685 603. 4 the election commission of india represented by chief election commissioner, nirvachan sadan, ashoka road, new delhi - 110 001. 5 state of kerala represented by the chief secretary to government, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. sri.unnikrishnan v.alapatt, sc, idukki district panchayath sri.murali purushothaman, sc,ele.commn. sri.deepu lal mohan w.p.(c)no.10161/2016 2 sri.murali purushothaman scele.commn. other present: sri. venugopal v (gp) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 26.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c)no.10161/2016 3judgmentthis writ petition was filed regarding certain restrictions placed on account of the model code of conduct announced f0r the general election to the legislative assembly of the state of kerala in the year 2016. it is clear that, by passage of time the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. gopinath p. judge acd w.p.(c)no.10161/2016 4 appendix of wp(c) 10161/2016 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1:-true copy of list of the projects with the estimated cost.exhibit p2:- a true copy of the medical code of conduct for the guidance of political parties and candidated issued by the election commission of india.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 10161 OF 2016 PETITIONER: INFANT THOMAS AGED 53 YEARS AGED 53 YEARS,S/O. THOMAS MEMBER, ADIMALY DIVISION DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, IDUKKI, RESIDING AT MATTEL HOUSE,MACHIPLAVU P.O., CHOTTUPARA, IDUKKI DISTRICT. SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR SMT.T.J.SEEMA SMT.SMITHA PHILIPOSE RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001. 2 THE IDUKKI DISTRICT PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PAINAVU, IDUKKI, KUYILUMALA- 685 603. 3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DISTRICT PANCHAYATH, PAINAVU, IDUKKI KUYILUMALA - 685 603. 4 THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, NIRVACHAN SADAN, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 5 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. SRI.UNNIKRISHNAN V.ALAPATT, SC, IDUKKI DISTRICT PANCHAYATH SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,ELE.COMMN. SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN W.P.(C)No.10161/2016 2 SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN SCELE.COMMN. OTHER PRESENT: SRI. VENUGOPAL V (GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C)No.10161/2016 3

JUDGMENT

This writ petition was filed regarding certain restrictions placed on account of the Model Code of Conduct announced f0r the general election to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Kerala in the year 2016. It is clear that, by passage of time the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. GOPINATH P. JUDGE acd W.P.(C)No.10161/2016 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10161/2016 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1:-TRUE COPY OF LIST OF THE PROJECTS WITH THE ESTIMATED COST.

EXHIBIT P2:- A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE GUIDANCE OF POLITICAL PARTIES AND CANDIDATED ISSUED BY THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA.

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2024 Same Parties Infant Thomas vs State of Kerala Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Gopinath P.

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales