Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sri.Jayaprakash vs State of Kerala

Sri.Jayaprakash vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 29, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1297967

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/7315/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sri.Jayaprakash

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. wednesday, the 29th day of may 2024 / 8th jyaishta, 1946 wp(c) no. 7315 of 2017 petitioner/s: sri.jayaprakash, aged 57 years s/o.kumaran vaidyan, renjith nivas, puliyoor vanchi p.o., thodiyoor, karunagappally, kollam respondent/s:1 state of kerala represented by its secretary to government, revenue department, government secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695 001 2 the district collector kollam -691 001 3 the tahasildar karunagappally taluk office, karunagappally, kollam 4 the village officer, thodiyoor village office, thodiyoor, karunagappally, kollam, 690 518 5 anju prakash, aged 27, d/o.prakasan, kannittayil veedu, kulangarabhagom,chavara p.o., karunagappally, kollam 691 583 6 anoop prakash aged 31 years s/o.jayaprakash, chief electoral office, union territory, kavarathi, lakshadweep 682 555 dr. thushara james, sr. gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on29.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c) no. 7315 of 2017 2judgmentwhen this matter is taken up for consideration today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- gopinath p. judge ajt wp(c) no. 7315 of 2017 3 appendix of wp(c) 7315/2017 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of cmp 95 of 2015 filed before the family court, chavara by the 5th respondent exhibit p2 the true copy of the notices dated 16.8.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent exhibit p3 the true copy of the objection dated 31.10.2016 filed before the 3rd respondentexhibit p4 the true copy of the reply dated 18.11.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent to the exhibit p5 the true copy of the petition dated 1.12.2016filed before the 2nd respondent by the exhibit p6 the true copy of the order dated 1.2.2017 of the 2nd respondent

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 7315 OF 2017 PETITIONER/S: SRI.JAYAPRAKASH, AGED 57 YEARS S/O.KUMARAN VAIDYAN, RENJITH NIVAS, PULIYOOR VANCHI P.O., THODIYOOR, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM RESPONDENT/S:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM -691 001 3 THE TAHASILDAR KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK OFFICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THODIYOOR VILLAGE OFFICE, THODIYOOR, KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM, 690 518 5 ANJU PRAKASH, AGED 27, D/O.PRAKASAN, KANNITTAYIL VEEDU, KULANGARABHAGOM,CHAVARA P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM 691 583 6 ANOOP PRAKASH AGED 31 YEARS S/O.JAYAPRAKASH, CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICE, UNION TERRITORY, KAVARATHI, LAKSHADWEEP 682 555 DR. THUSHARA JAMES, SR. GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

29.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 7315 OF 2017 2

JUDGMENT

When this matter is taken up for consideration today, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ajt WP(C) NO. 7315 OF 2017 3 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7315/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF CMP 95 OF 2015 FILED BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, CHAVARA BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICES DATED 16.8.2016 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 31.10.2016 FILED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT

EXHIBIT P4             THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 18.11.2016
                       ISSUED   BY   THE    3RD    RESPONDENT   TO   THE
EXHIBIT P5             THE TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 1.12.2016

FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE EXHIBIT P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 1.2.2017 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial