Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rsp Constructions vs the District Disaster Management Authority

Rsp Constructions vs The District Disaster Management Authority

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 25, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1297676

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/20966/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rsp Constructions

Respondent

The District Disaster Management Authority

Excerpt

.....rep.by its secretary. 4 the secretary kochi municipal corporation, ernakulam district - 682 031. 5 the executive engineer local self government department, kochi municipal corporation, ernakulam district - 682 031.by adv r.harishankar sri.k.janardhana shenoy sri.appu p.s- gp this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 25.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:t.r. ravi, j.w.p(c).no.20966 of 2021 dated this the 25th day of march, 2024judgmentthe petitioner has approached this court seeking consideration of ext.p2 bill. a counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents stating that ext.p2 bill relates to work on which there has been no agreement entered into between the parties. however, admittedly, the bill has not been rejected and the bill is still with the respondents. in the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on ext.p2 bill at the earliest, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- t.r.ravi judge mpm appendix of wp(c) 20966/2021 petitioner’s exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the work order issued by the fifth respondent dated nil. exhibit p2 true copy of the bill dated 26.6.2020 submitted by the petitioner before the second respondent.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1946 PETITIONER: RSP CONSTRUCTIONS OPP. CIVIL STATION, INFOPARK ROAD, KAKKANAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR N.R.SHAJI, S/O.N.K. RAJAN, AGED 54 YEARS, NANIYATTIL HOUSE, KAKKANAD P.O., KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. P.M.ZIRAJ MOHEMED FAVAS HASHARURAHIMAN U. RESPONDENTS:

1 THE DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM - 682 030, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, CIVIL STATION, COLLECTORATE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 030, CHAIRMAN OF THE DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. 3 KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 031, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 4 THE SECRETARY KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 031. 5 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 031.

BY ADV R.HARISHANKAR SRI.K.JANARDHANA SHENOY SRI.APPU P.S- GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

T.R. RAVI, J.

W.P(C).No.20966 of 2021 Dated this the 25th day of March, 2024

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking consideration of Ext.P2 bill. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents stating that Ext.P2 bill relates to work on which there has been no agreement entered into between the parties. However, admittedly, the bill has not been rejected and the bill is still with the respondents. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 bill at the earliest, at any rate, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE mpm APPENDIX OF WP(C) 20966/2021 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE WORK ORDER ISSUED BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT DATED NIL. Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE BILL DATED 26.6.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial