Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Preethi, vs Hareesh. C,

Preethi, vs Hareesh. C,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 26, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1296965

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/507/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Preethi,

Respondent

Hareesh. C,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran & the honourable mrs. justice m.b. snehalatha friday, the 26th day of july 2024 / 4th sravana, 1946 mat.appeal no.507 of 2021 against the judgment dated 27.03.2021in op no.492 of 2016 of family court, palakkad appellants/petitioners: 1 preethi, aged 30 years, w/o. hareesh, r/a aathira, kailas nagar, d2, kanjikode west, puthussery, palakkad taluk, palakkad district-678 623 2 aadith, aged 8 years (minor), s/o. hareesh, (minor petitioner represented by next friend mother preethi). aqib sohail p.s. rizwana a.a.(k/1981/2019) respondents/respondents: 1 hareesh. c, aged 35 years s/o. rajagopala menon, poopullikkadu, vellappara kunnu (house), chithali (p.o), palakkad-678 702 2 sathidevi, w/o. rajagopala menon, poopullikkadu, vellappara kunnu (house), chithali (p.o), palakkad- rajesh sivaramankutty arul muralidharan this matrimonial appeal having been finally heard on 26.07.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: mat.appeal no.507 of 2021 2judgmentdevan ramachandran, j.this matter has been listed today at the request of the learned counsel on both sides, stating that all disputes between the parties have been settled.2. smt.rizwana a.a - learned counsel for the appellants, submitted that the compromise between the parties have already been recorded by this court in thejudgment in mat.appeal no.467 of 2021 filed by the 1 strespondent herein; and that her clients abide by the same, as being in full and final settlement of all disputes. in the above circumstances, we close this mat.appeal, without entering into the merits of any of the rival mat.appeal no.507 of 2021 3 contentions and recording that the parties have settled all their disputes in full and final settlement, as recorded by us in the judgment in mat.appeal no.467 of 2021. devan ramachandran m.b.snehalatha sp/26/07/2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1946 MAT.APPEAL NO.507 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.03.2021IN OP NO.492 OF 2016 OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS: 1 PREETHI, AGED 30 YEARS, W/O. HAREESH, R/A AATHIRA, KAILAS NAGAR, D2, KANJIKODE WEST, PUTHUSSERY, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 623 2 AADITH, AGED 8 YEARS (MINOR), S/O. HAREESH, (MINOR PETITIONER REPRESENTED BY NEXT FRIEND MOTHER PREETHI). AQIB SOHAIL P.S. RIZWANA A.A.(K/1981/2019) RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 HAREESH. C, AGED 35 YEARS S/O. RAJAGOPALA MENON, POOPULLIKKADU, VELLAPPARA KUNNU (HOUSE), CHITHALI (P.O), PALAKKAD-678 702 2 SATHIDEVI, W/O. RAJAGOPALA MENON, POOPULLIKKADU, VELLAPPARA KUNNU (HOUSE), CHITHALI (P.O), PALAKKAD- RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY ARUL MURALIDHARAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mat.Appeal No.507 of 2021 2

JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

This matter has been listed today at the request of the learned Counsel on both sides, stating that all disputes between the parties have been settled.

2. Smt.Rizwana A.A - learned Counsel for the appellants, submitted that the compromise between the parties have already been recorded by this Court in the

judgment in Mat.Appeal No.467 of 2021 filed by the 1 st

respondent herein; and that her clients abide by the same, as being in full and final settlement of all disputes. In the above circumstances, we close this Mat.Appeal, without entering into the merits of any of the rival Mat.Appeal No.507 of 2021 3 contentions and recording that the parties have settled all their disputes in full and final settlement, as recorded by us in the judgment in Mat.Appeal No.467 of 2021. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN M.B.SNEHALATHA sp/26/07/2024

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial