Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sabitha vs the Agricultural Workers Welfare Fund Board

Sabitha vs The Agricultural Workers Welfare Fund Board

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 22, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1296350

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/3383/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sabitha

Respondent

The Agricultural Workers Welfare Fund Board

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. thursday, the 22nd day of february 2024 / 3rd phalguna, 1945 wp(c) no. 3383 of 2015 petitioner: sabitha s.b. aged 36 years, w/o.basheer, elanjikkal house, thirumala ward, chungam, alappuzha-688 011. by advs. sri.n.g.sunil smt.p.jaya respondents:1 the kerala agricultural workers welfare fund board represented by its chief executive, s.n.park, poothole p.o., thrissur-4. 2 k.t.ithihas chairman, the kerala agricultural workers welfare fund board, s.n.park, poothole p.o., thrissur-4. 3 the welfare fund officer kerala agricultural welfare fund board district office, melvaly building, c.c., s.b.road, kallupalam, alappuzha-688 011. 4 the state of kerala department of labour, govt.secretariat, thiruvananthapuram-695 001, represented by its secretary. by advs sri.k.m sathyanatha menon k.m sri. venugopal v (gp) this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on22.02.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -:2:-judgmentwhen this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter. taking into consideration the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed, making it clear that it will be open to the petitioner to seek reopening of the matter, if necessary. sd/- gopinath p. judge ats -:3:- appendix of wp(c) 3383/2015 petitioner’s exhibits ext. p1 : true copy of the representation dt.27-1-14 to hon'ble minister for labour. ext. p2 : true copy of the letter dt.27-1-14 of smt.k.r.gowri amma.ext. p3 : true copy of the certified copy of the judgmentin wpc 3172/14. ext. p4 : true copy of the representation made to r1 ext. p5 : true copy of the representation made to r4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 3383 OF 2015 PETITIONER: SABITHA S.B. AGED 36 YEARS, W/O.BASHEER, ELANJIKKAL HOUSE, THIRUMALA WARD, CHUNGAM, ALAPPUZHA-688 011. BY ADVS. SRI.N.G.SUNIL SMT.P.JAYA RESPONDENTS:

1 THE KERALA AGRICULTURAL WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE, S.N.PARK, POOTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR-4. 2 K.T.ITHIHAS CHAIRMAN, THE KERALA AGRICULTURAL WORKERS WELFARE FUND BOARD, S.N.PARK, POOTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR-4. 3 THE WELFARE FUND OFFICER KERALA AGRICULTURAL WELFARE FUND BOARD DISTRICT OFFICE, MELVALY BUILDING, C.C., S.B.ROAD, KALLUPALAM, ALAPPUZHA-688 011. 4 THE STATE OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS SRI.K.M SATHYANATHA MENON K.M SRI. VENUGOPAL V (GP) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

22.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:-

JUDGMENT

When this matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter. Taking into consideration the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed, making it clear that it will be open to the petitioner to seek reopening of the matter, if necessary. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE ats -:3:- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3383/2015 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.27-1-14 TO HON'BLE MINISTER FOR LABOUR. EXT. P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT.27-1-14 OF SMT.K.R.GOWRI AMMA.

EXT. P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

IN WPC 3172/14. EXT. P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE TO R1 EXT. P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION MADE TO R4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial