Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shenfeer vs Fathima

Shenfeer vs Fathima

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 08, 2024
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1294951

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/376/2016

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shenfeer

Respondent

Fathima

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan monday, the 8th day of january 2024 / 18th pousha, 1945 rpfc no. 376 of 2016 against the order dated 25.09.2015 in mc 62/2014 of family court, vatakara revision petitioner/respondent: shenfeer, aged 33 years, s/o abdul salam, thattumpurath house, ulliyeri amsom desom, koyilandy taluk.respondent/petitioner: fathima, aged 31 years, kovilkandy fishermen colony, panthalayani village, koyilandy taluk-673 305. by adv sri.santharam.p this rev.petition(family court) having come up for hearing on 08.01.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: rp (fc) no.376 of 2016 2ordercounsel for the revision petitioner passed away. though this court, as an abundant caution, ordered notice to the revision petitioner, it was not returned after service. revision petitioner remained absent. it is against the order passed by the trial court pertaining to maintenance. hence, r.p (fc) will stand dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge dmr/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN MONDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 18TH POUSHA, 1945 RPFC NO. 376 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 25.09.2015 IN MC 62/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, VATAKARA REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: SHENFEER, AGED 33 YEARS, S/o ABDUL SALAM, THATTUMPURATH HOUSE, ULLIYERI AMSOM DESOM, KOYILANDY TALUK.

RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: FATHIMA, AGED 31 YEARS, KOVILKANDY FISHERMEN COLONY, PANTHALAYANI VILLAGE, KOYILANDY TALUK-673 305. BY ADV SRI.SANTHARAM.P THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 08.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP (FC) No.376 of 2016 2

ORDER

Counsel for the revision petitioner passed away. Though this court, as an abundant caution, ordered notice to the revision petitioner, it was not returned after service. Revision petitioner remained absent. It is against the order passed by the trial court pertaining to maintenance. Hence, R.P (FC) will stand dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial