Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anzar E. vs State of Kerala

Anzar E. vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided May 28, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1294747

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/3560/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anzar E.

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen tuesday, the 28th day of may 2024 / 7th jyaishta, 1946 crl.mc no. 3560 of 2020 crime no.975/2014 of central police station, ernakulam petitioner/1st accused: anzar e. aged 41 years s/o.late ibrahim kutty, nedumthodath mekkathil house, mukundapuram p.o., chavara, kollam district. by advs. v.philip mathew sri.johnson k.kurien sri.gibi.c.george sri.jeph joseph respondents/state & the defacto complainant: 1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam - 682 031. 2 haseena aged 32, d/o.ibrahim kutty, puthenpurayakkal house, near idakkulangara sree budha school, idakkulangara p.o., thodiyur village, kollam district - 690 523. by adv subhash syriac sr pp - renjit george this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 28.05.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.m.c. no. 3560 of 2020orderdated this the 28th day of may, 2024 this criminal miscellaneous case has been filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings pursuant to annexure-i fir no.975/2014 of central police station, ernakulam, where the prosecution alleges commission of offecnes punishable under sections 417, 468, 471 read with 34 of ipc by the accused .2. no representation for the petitioner.3. since the learned counsel for the petitioner is notintended to proceed with the matter, this petition stands dismissed for default. interim stay in the matter of issuing warrant against the petitioner stands vacated. registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the trial court, for information and further steps. sd/- a. badharudeen judge sk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 7TH JYAISHTA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 3560 OF 2020 CRIME NO.975/2014 OF CENTRAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED: ANZAR E. AGED 41 YEARS S/O.LATE IBRAHIM KUTTY, NEDUMTHODATH MEKKATHIL HOUSE, MUKUNDAPURAM P.O., CHAVARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. V.PHILIP MATHEW SRI.JOHNSON K.KURIEN SRI.GIBI.C.GEORGE SRI.JEPH JOSEPH RESPONDENTS/STATE & THE DEFACTO COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031. 2 HASEENA AGED 32, D/O.IBRAHIM KUTTY, PUTHENPURAYAKKAL HOUSE, NEAR IDAKKULANGARA SREE BUDHA SCHOOL, IDAKKULANGARA P.O., THODIYUR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT - 690 523. BY ADV SUBHASH SYRIAC SR PP - RENJIT GEORGE THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C. No. 3560 of 2020

ORDER

Dated this the 28th day of May, 2024 This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure-I FIR No.975/2014 of Central Police Station, Ernakulam, where the prosecution alleges commission of offecnes punishable under Sections 417, 468, 471 read with 34 of IPC by the accused .

2. No representation for the petitioner.

3. Since the learned counsel for the petitioner is not

intended to proceed with the matter, this petition stands dismissed for default. Interim stay in the matter of issuing warrant against the petitioner stands vacated. Registry is directed to forward a copy of this order to the trial court, for information and further steps. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE SK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial