Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aminakutty vs Suhra Mohammed

Aminakutty vs Suhra Mohammed

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 05, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1293892

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/692/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aminakutty

Respondent

Suhra Mohammed

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. tuesday, the 5th day of march 2024 / 15th phalguna, 1945 maca no. 692 of 2020 opmv no.162 of 2018 of motor accident claims tribunal vadakara appellant/petitioner: aminakutty, aged 55 years d/o. abdulla kutty, nedungattu purath house, kattila peedikha, p.o.vengalam, chemancheri, quilandy taluk, kozhikode district-673 303 by advs. m.promodh kumar smt.maya chandran respondents/respondents: 1 suhra mohammed, thayyil house ,p.o., 2 muhammed iqbal, aged 61 years s/o. m.p.kunhotty, mele plathottathil house, 3 united india insurance company limited, rep by its divisional manager, 4th floor, opposite kurisupally, bank road, kozhikode-673 adv. sri. p.k. manoj kumar-r3 this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 05.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: m.a.c.a. no.692/2020 :2 :judgmentlast time, when the matter came up for consideration, the following order was passed: “the appellant is granted one more week time to take steps to implead the legal heirs of the 2 nd respondent as last chance. in case, the steps are not taken within the said time, the appeal shall stand dismissed.” today also, no steps are taken and therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge ncd/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1945 MACA NO. 692 OF 2020 OPMV NO.162 OF 2018 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL VADAKARA APPELLANT/PETITIONER: AMINAKUTTY, AGED 55 YEARS D/O. ABDULLA KUTTY, NEDUNGATTU PURATH HOUSE, KATTILA PEEDIKHA, P.O.VENGALAM, CHEMANCHERI, QUILANDY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT-673 303 BY ADVS. M.PROMODH KUMAR SMT.MAYA CHANDRAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 SUHRA MOHAMMED, THAYYIL HOUSE ,P.O., 2 MUHAMMED IQBAL, AGED 61 YEARS S/O. M.P.KUNHOTTY, MELE PLATHOTTATHIL HOUSE, 3 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, 4TH FLOOR, OPPOSITE KURISUPALLY, BANK ROAD, KOZHIKODE-673 ADV. SRI. P.K. MANOJ KUMAR-R3 THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: M.A.C.A. No.692/2020 :2 :

JUDGMENT

Last time, when the matter came up for consideration, the following order was passed: “The appellant is granted one more week time to take steps to implead the legal heirs of the 2 nd respondent as last chance. In case, the steps are not taken within the said time, the appeal shall stand dismissed.” Today also, no steps are taken and therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE ncd/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial