Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sumesh Joseph vs Jose Manuel

Sumesh Joseph vs Jose Manuel

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 27, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1293176

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/206/2007

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumesh Joseph

Respondent

Jose Manuel

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shoba annamma eapen wednesday, the 27th day of march 2024 / 7th chaithra, 1946 rfa no. 206 of 2007 [against the judgment dated 13.10.2006 in os no.9 of 2006 of sub court, pala] appellant/defendant: sumesh joseph, s/o.joseph joseph, manarakattu house, lalam village and kara,meenachil taluk. by advs. sri.k.v.gopinathan nair sri.t.i.abdul salam p.c. haridas respondent/plaintiff: jose manuel s/o.manuel, manayanickal house, kizhathadiyoor kara, lalam village, meenachil taluk. by sr.adv sri.k.gopalakrishna kurup this regular first appeal having come up for admission on 27.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.f.a. no. 206 of 2007 :-2-:judgmentlearned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled out of court. he filed a not pressed memo stating that the parties have amicably settled all their disputes out of court and hence, the appellant does not want to pursue the appeal any further. the memo is recorded. accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal shall be refunded to the appellant. all interlocutory applications are closed. sd/- shoba annamma eapen, judge mbs/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1946 RFA NO. 206 OF 2007 [AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.10.2006 IN OS NO.9 OF 2006 OF SUB COURT, PALA] APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: SUMESH JOSEPH, S/O.JOSEPH JOSEPH, MANARAKATTU HOUSE, LALAM VILLAGE AND KARA,MEENACHIL TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.T.I.ABDUL SALAM P.C. Haridas RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: JOSE MANUEL S/O.MANUEL, MANAYANICKAL HOUSE, KIZHATHADIYOOR KARA, LALAM VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK. BY SR.ADV SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.F.A. NO. 206 OF 2007 :-2-:

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has been settled out of court. He filed a not pressed memo stating that the parties have amicably settled all their disputes out of court and hence, the appellant does not want to pursue the appeal any further. The memo is recorded. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. The court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal shall be refunded to the appellant. All interlocutory applications are closed. sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JUDGE MBS/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial