Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayalekshmi vs K.S. Krishnagowda

Jayalekshmi vs K.S. Krishnagowda

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 18, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1293133

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/3591/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayalekshmi

Respondent

K.S. Krishnagowda

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice ziyad rahman a.a. monday, the 18th day of march 2024 / 28th phalguna, 1945 maca no. 3591 of 2015 op(mv) 2029/2001 of motor accident claims tribunal, attingal appellants/petitioners:1 jayalekshmi, aged 52, w/o.late viswanathan chettiyar, "adheena",house no.sp-iii/268, mavelistore buildings, kariyam, sreekariyam p.o, 2 adheena, aged 27, d/o.late viswanathan chettiyar, 3 vishnu, aged 25, s/o.late viswanathan chettiyar, 4 velayudhan chettiyar, s/o.adakkalam chettiyar, 5 valliyammal, w/o.velayudhan chettiyar, "adheena", house no.sp-iii/268, mavelistore buildings, kariyam, sreekariyam p.o, thiruvananthapuram-17. by advs. sri.nagaraj narayanan sri.benoj c augustin sri.saijo hassan sri.sebin thomas1. respondents/respondents:1 k.s. krishnagowda, s/o.subbaiah, no.16, 1st cross, m.s.nagar, bangalore-33. 2 t.m. ramesha, s/o.munithimmaih, near uthunur (3 km), mugagal taluk,kolar district, karnataka state - 563101. :2 : 3 m/s. the oriental insurance co. ltd., divisional office no.ii, st.marry villa, ulloor,medical college p.o, thiruvananthapuram-11. by adv dr.elizabeth varkey this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 18.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: :3 :judgmentthe 1st respondent in this appeal expired and the notice to the 2nd respondent returned with an endorsement “insufficient address”. the appellants were being granted time to take necessary steps in this regard from 13.01.2023 onwards.2. when the matter came up for consideration on 16.01.2024, the following order was passed: “appellant is granted one more week time to cure the defects. in case, defect is not cured within that time, appeal will stand dismissed.” today also, no steps have been taken. therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge ncd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1945 MACA NO. 3591 OF 2015 OP(MV) 2029/2001 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, ATTINGAL APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:

1 JAYALEKSHMI, AGED 52, W/O.LATE VISWANATHAN CHETTIYAR, "ADHEENA",HOUSE NO.SP-III/268, MAVELISTORE BUILDINGS, KARIYAM, SREEKARIYAM P.O, 2 ADHEENA, AGED 27, D/O.LATE VISWANATHAN CHETTIYAR, 3 VISHNU, AGED 25, S/O.LATE VISWANATHAN CHETTIYAR, 4 VELAYUDHAN CHETTIYAR, S/O.ADAKKALAM CHETTIYAR, 5 VALLIYAMMAL, W/O.VELAYUDHAN CHETTIYAR, "ADHEENA", HOUSE NO.SP-III/268, MAVELISTORE BUILDINGS, KARIYAM, SREEKARIYAM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-17. BY ADVS. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.SEBIN THOMAS

1. RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

1 K.S. KRISHNAGOWDA, S/O.SUBBAIAH, NO.16, 1ST CROSS, M.S.NAGAR, BANGALORE-33. 2 T.M. RAMESHA, S/O.MUNITHIMMAIH, NEAR UTHUNUR (3 KM), MUGAGAL TALUK,KOLAR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE - 563101. :2 : 3 M/S. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE NO.II, ST.MARRY VILLA, ULLOOR,MEDICAL COLLEGE P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-11. BY ADV DR.ELIZABETH VARKEY THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: :3 :

JUDGMENT

The 1st respondent in this appeal expired and the notice to the 2nd respondent returned with an endorsement “insufficient address”. The appellants were being granted time to take necessary steps in this regard from 13.01.2023 onwards.

2. When the matter came up for consideration on 16.01.2024, the following order was passed: “Appellant is granted one more week time to cure the defects. In case, defect is not cured within that time, appeal will stand dismissed.” Today also, no steps have been taken. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE ncd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial