Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

The Excise Commissioner vs Madhavan Chellappan

The Excise Commissioner vs Madhavan Chellappan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 31, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1293011

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/1693/2012

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Excise Commissioner

Respondent

Madhavan Chellappan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice viju abraham wednesday, the 31st day of july 2024 / 9th sravana, 1946 op(c) no. 1693 of 2012 against the order/judgment dated in lar no.229 of 1985 of assistant sessions court/sub court / commercial court, cherthala petitioner: the excise commissioner thiruvananthapuram. by government pleader s.unnikrishnan respondents: 1 madhavan chellappan kakkathuruthil, varanam muri, thanneermukkom p.o., pin-688527. 2 steel industries kerala ltd. s.l.puram, shertallay, rep. by its managing director, mararikulam north p.o., pin-688549. this op (civil) having been finally heard on 31.07.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: op(c) no.1693 of 2012 2viju abraham, j.o.p.(c) no.1693 of 2012 dated this the 31st day of july, 2024judgmentwhen the matter was taken up for consideration the learned government pleader appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition is not pressed. accordingly the original petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- viju abraham judge cks op(c) no.1693 of 2012 3 appendix in op(c) no.1693 of 2012 petitioner’s exhibits ext.p1 - true copy of ep no.115/2005 ext.p2 - true copy of ea no.294 of 2008 ext.p3 - true copy of ext.p2 order, an order of warrant on attachment of the amount ext.p4 - true copy of the judgment dated 36.02.2010 in wp(c) no.31577 /2009

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2024 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1946 OP(C) NO. 1693 OF 2012 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN LAR NO.229 OF 1985 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT, CHERTHALA PETITIONER: THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER S.UNNIKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: 1 MADHAVAN CHELLAPPAN KAKKATHURUTHIL, VARANAM MURI, THANNEERMUKKOM P.O., PIN-688527. 2 STEEL INDUSTRIES KERALA LTD. S.L.PURAM, SHERTALLAY, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MARARIKULAM NORTH P.O., PIN-688549. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(C) No.1693 of 2012 2

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

O.P.(C) No.1693 of 2012 Dated this the 31st day of July, 2024

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for consideration the learned Government Pleader appearing for the petitioner submits that the original petition is not pressed. Accordingly the original petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE cks OP(C) No.1693 of 2012 3 APPENDIX IN OP(C) NO.1693 OF 2012 PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF EP NO.115/2005 EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF EA NO.294 OF 2008 EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF EXT.P2 ORDER, AN ORDER OF WARRANT ON ATTACHMENT OF THE AMOUNT EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 36.02.2010 IN WP(C) NO.31577 /2009

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial