Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

P.Radhamma vs Travancore Devaswom Board

P.Radhamma vs Travancore Devaswom Board

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 18, 2024
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1292207

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RP/301/1995

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Radhamma

Respondent

Travancore Devaswom Board

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice mohammed nias c.p. monday, the 18th day of march 2024 / 28th phalguna, 1945 rp no. 301 of 1995 review petitioner: p.radhamma by adv sri.v.divakaran potti respondent: travancore devaswom board sri.premchand r.nair, sr.gp this review petition having come up for admission on 18.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: r.p.no.301/1995 ..2..mohammed nias c.p., j.--------------------- r.p. no. 301 of 1995 --------------------------- dated this the 18th day of march, 2024orderthere is no representation for the petitioner. obviously, the matter would have become infructuous. the review petition is accordingly closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek restoration in case the cause of action, as alleged in the petition, still survives. sd/- mohammed nias c.p. judge apa

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1945 RP NO. 301 OF 1995 REVIEW PETITIONER: P.RADHAMMA BY ADV SRI.V.DIVAKARAN POTTI RESPONDENT: TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD SRI.PREMCHAND R.NAIR, SR.GP THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: R.P.No.301/1995 ..2..

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.

--------------------- R.P. No. 301 of 1995 --------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of March, 2024

ORDER

There is no representation for the petitioner. Obviously, the matter would have become infructuous. The Review Petition is accordingly closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek restoration in case the cause of action, as alleged in the petition, still survives. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE APA

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties P.Radhamma vs Travancore Devaswom Board Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Nias C.P.

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales