Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sathyanessan vs Babu,

Sathyanessan vs BABU,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 24, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1292167

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/688/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sathyanessan

Respondent

BABU,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen wednesday, the 24th day of january 2024 / 4th magha, 1945 against the decree and judgment in as 27/2014 of additional district court -vii, thiruvananthapuram against the decree and judgment in os 8/1997 of sub court, nedumangad appellant/respondent/defendant: sathyanessan aged 57 years s/o devadasan nair, sathya bhavan, vettavila punalal muri, perumkulam village, nedumangad taluk. abraham mathew (vettoor) anil abey jose respondent/appellant/plaintiff: babu, s/o lasar nadar, pottamanapazhinji puthen veedu, kazhuvoor desom, kanhiramkulam village, thiruvananthapuram.smrithi s.s. v.suresh(k282/1989) g.sudheer(k/000467/1992) r.harikrishnan (h-308)(k/000642/2013) this regular second appeal having come up for admission on 24.01.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 24th day of january, 2024 this regular second appeal has been filed under section 100 and order xlii rule 1 of the code of civil procedure, challenging the judgment and decree dated in a.s.no.27/2014 on the files of the additional district court-vii, thiruvananthapuram and also the judgment and decree in o.s.no.8/1997 on the files of the sub court, nedumangad.2. no representation for the appellant. since theappellant is not ready to argue the matter, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. all interlocutory orders stand vacated and all interlocutory applications pending in this regular second appeal stand dismissed. registry shall inform this matter to the trial court as well as the appellate court forthwith. sd/- a. badharudeen judge nkr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 4TH MAGHA, 1945 AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN AS 27/2014 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT -VII, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 8/1997 OF SUB COURT, NEDUMANGAD APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: SATHYANESSAN AGED 57 YEARS S/O DEVADASAN NAIR, SATHYA BHAVAN, VETTAVILA PUNALAL MURI, PERUMKULAM VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD TALUK. ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR) ANIL ABEY JOSE RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: BABU, S/O LASAR NADAR, POTTAMANAPAZHINJI PUTHEN VEEDU, KAZHUVOOR DESOM, KANHIRAMKULAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

SMRITHI S.S. V.SURESH(K282/1989) G.SUDHEER(K/000467/1992) R.HARIKRISHNAN (H-308)(K/000642/2013) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 24th day of January, 2024 This Regular Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 and Order XLII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenging the judgment and decree dated in A.S.No.27/2014 on the files of the Additional District Court-VII, Thiruvananthapuram and also the judgment and decree in O.S.No.8/1997 on the files of the Sub Court, Nedumangad.

2. No representation for the appellant. Since the

appellant is not ready to argue the matter, this appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. All interlocutory orders stand vacated and all interlocutory applications pending in this regular second appeal stand dismissed. Registry shall inform this matter to the trial court as well as the appellate court forthwith. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE nkr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial