Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sunilkumar vs C.V. Sunitha

Sunilkumar vs C.V. Sunitha

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 22, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1292046

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Mat.Appeal/693/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunilkumar

Respondent

C.V. Sunitha

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice anu sivaraman & the honourable mr. justice c.pratheep kumar monday, the 22nd day of january 2024 / 2nd magha, 1945 against the order/judgment op 143/2013 of family court, tirur appellants/respondents in op:1 sunilkumar s/o. kutti balan,aged 42 years, padinharepatt house,indianoor p.o., (via) kottakkal,tirur taluk, malappuram district. 2 kalyani thanku w/o. kutti balan, aged 63 years,padinharepatt veedu, near ganapathi temple, indanoor p.o.,(via) kottakkal, tirur taluk, malappuram district. 3 anitha m.p. w/o. rajan, punathil house,ponnaramtheruvu, balussery p.o., kozhikode. 4 sindhu m.p. w/o. ullasan, aged 40 years, c/o. vandana textiles,kattilangadi street, tanur, tirur taluk - 676 302. by advs. sri.r.parthasarathy smt.seemarespondent/petitioner in op: c.v. sunitha d/o. c.v. balan, aged 34 years, chundanveettil house,kuttilangadi, tanur p.o., tirur taluk,malappuram district - 676 302. by adv sri.jamsheed hafiz this matrimonial appeal having come up for hearing on 22.01.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdated this the 22nd day of january, 2024 anu sivaraman, j it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on either side that the parties have settled their disputes and a compromise application is filed as ia no.1/2023. it is submitted that pursuant to the agreement, the parties are now living together. having considered the contentions advanced and having heard both the parties, the compromise application is allowed. the mat. appeal is closed as not pressed, in the light of the compromise entered into between the parties. the terms of the settlement are recorded and the parties shall be bound by the same. the security furnished as per interim order dated 07.07.2017 shall be released to the appellant. this mat. appeal is thus ordered. anu sivaraman c.pratheep kumar nsd

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 2ND MAGHA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OP 143/2013 OF FAMILY COURT, TIRUR APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS IN OP:

1 SUNILKUMAR S/O. KUTTI BALAN,AGED 42 YEARS, PADINHAREPATT HOUSE,INDIANOOR P.O., (VIA) KOTTAKKAL,TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 2 KALYANI THANKU W/O. KUTTI BALAN, AGED 63 YEARS,PADINHAREPATT VEEDU, NEAR GANAPATHI TEMPLE, INDANOOR P.O.,(VIA) KOTTAKKAL, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. 3 ANITHA M.P. W/O. RAJAN, PUNATHIL HOUSE,PONNARAMTHERUVU, BALUSSERY P.O., KOZHIKODE. 4 SINDHU M.P. W/O. ULLASAN, AGED 40 YEARS, C/O. VANDANA TEXTILES,KATTILANGADI STREET, TANUR, TIRUR TALUK - 676 302. BY ADVS. SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY SMT.SEEMA

RESPONDENT/PETITIONER IN OP: C.V. SUNITHA D/O. C.V. BALAN, AGED 34 YEARS, CHUNDANVEETTIL HOUSE,KUTTILANGADI, TANUR P.O., TIRUR TALUK,MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 302. BY ADV SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 22.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2024 ANU SIVARAMAN, J It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing on either side that the parties have settled their disputes and a compromise application is filed as IA No.1/2023. It is submitted that pursuant to the agreement, the parties are now living together. Having considered the contentions advanced and having heard both the parties, the compromise application is allowed. The Mat. Appeal is closed as not pressed, in the light of the compromise entered into between the parties. The terms of the settlement are recorded and the parties shall be bound by the same. The security furnished as per interim order dated 07.07.2017 shall be released to the appellant. This Mat. Appeal is thus ordered. ANU SIVARAMAN C.PRATHEEP KUMAR Nsd

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial