Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vivek vs Karthu

VIVEK vs Karthu

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jul 12, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1290568

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/6157/2017

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

VIVEK

Respondent

Karthu

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice a. badharudeen friday, the 12th day of july 2024 / 21st ashadha, 1946 crl.mc no. 6157 of 2017 crime no.650/2017 of vadakkekad police station, thrissur petitioners/accused: 1 vivek s/o.madhavan nair, aged 40 years, vattathoor house, 2 vikas s/o.madhavan nair, aged 38 years, vattathoor house, 3 indira h/o madhavan nair, aged 65 years, vattathoor house, by adv sri.rajit respondents/defacto complainant and state: 1 karthu aged 40 years, valathil house, vadakkekad amsom, vadakkekad village, vadakkekad.p.o, thrissur district. 2 state of kerala rep by public prosecutor,high court of kerala. pp - m p prasanth this criminal misc. case having been finally heard on 12.07.2024, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 12th day of july, 2024 this criminal miscellaneous case has been filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings in crime no.650/2017 of vadakekad police station, thrissur. the petitioners are accused in the above crime.2. no representation for the petitioners.3. the learned public prosecutor would submit that,on investigation, refer report filed stating that the dispute is of civil nature. hence, this petition has become infructuous. recording the submission, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge any further proceedings which are adverse to the petitioners, as per law. sd/- a. badharudeen judge sk appendix of crl.mc 6157/2017petitioner annexures : annexure a true copy of the complaint submitted by the 1st respondent before dy.s.p.kunnamkulam. annexure b true copy of the fir 650/2017 registered against the petitioners by the vadakkekad police. annexure c true copy of the plant in o.s.813/2017 filed by the 1st respondent before the munsiff court.respondents’ annexures : nil

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 21ST ASHADHA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 6157 OF 2017 CRIME NO.650/2017 OF VADAKKEKAD POLICE STATION, THRISSUR PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: 1 VIVEK S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, AGED 40 YEARS, VATTATHOOR HOUSE, 2 VIKAS S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR, AGED 38 YEARS, VATTATHOOR HOUSE, 3 INDIRA H/O MADHAVAN NAIR, AGED 65 YEARS, VATTATHOOR HOUSE, BY ADV SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT AND STATE: 1 KARTHU AGED 40 YEARS, VALATHIL HOUSE, VADAKKEKAD AMSOM, VADAKKEKAD VILLAGE, VADAKKEKAD.P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2 STATE OF KERALA REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA. PP - M P PRASANTH THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 12th day of July, 2024 This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings in Crime No.650/2017 of Vadakekad Police Station, Thrissur. The petitioners are accused in the above crime.

2. No representation for the petitioners.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor would submit that,

on investigation, refer report filed stating that the dispute is of civil nature. Hence, this petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission, this petition stands dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge any further proceedings which are adverse to the petitioners, as per law. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE SK APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 6157/2017

PETITIONER ANNEXURES : ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE DY.S.P.KUNNAMKULAM. ANNEXURE B TRUE COPY OF THE FIR 650/2017 REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS BY THE VADAKKEKAD POLICE. ANNEXURE C TRUE COPY OF THE PLANT IN O.S.813/2017 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT.

RESPONDENTS’ ANNEXURES : NIL

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial