Biju Ramesh vs K.Babu

Biju Ramesh vs K.BABU

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Jan 03, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1290513

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1290513
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan
Decided On: Jan 03, 2024
Case Number: Crl.MC/6051/2015

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Biju Ramesh

Respondent

K.BABU

Excerpt

.....working as minister for fisheries, ports and excise, residing at "kaveri", no.6, eastern side of contonment house, thiruvananthapuram and having permanent address at kannuparambath house, sanskrit college road, tripunithura, ernakulam, pin - 682301.2 the state of kerala, represented by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam addl.r3 director of vigilance and anti corruption bureau, trivandrum (additional 3rd respondent is suo motu impleaded as perorder dated 10.03.2021 in crl.m.c.no.6051/15)r1 by advs. sri.c.s.ajith prakash sri.p.s.syamkuttan by public prosecutor sri. c.n.prabhakaran this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 03.01.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.m.c.no.6051 of 2015 2orderwhen the matter came up for hearing today, an application was submitted by both the parties in crl.m.a.no.1/2023 wherein both the parties settled the matter amicably. the prayer in the application is not for compounding the offence, but it is stated that they are not intending to proceed with the present case. at this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that it is due to an inadvertent mistake and they may be permitted to agitate the matter before the trial court by filing proper compounding application. without prejudice to the said right, the present crl.m.c. will stand dismissed. sd/- p.somarajan judge dmr/- crl.m.c.no.6051 of 2015 3 appendix of crl.mc 6051/2015 petitioner's annexures annexure a1 certified copy of the complaint in cc no judicial magistrate court, ernakulam annexure a2 true copy of the lawyer's notice issued to the accused on behalf of the complainant annexure a3 true copy of the reply notice dated 16/4/2015 // true copy // p.a. to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN WEDNESDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 13TH POUSHA, 1945 CRL.MC NO. 6051 OF 2015 CC 1024/2015 OF ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/ACCUSED: BIJU RAMESH, AGED 50 YEARS, S/o G RAMESAN,"SAMPTHRUPTHI", KOTTAKKAKAM, FORT P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM - 695 023 BY ADV SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: 1 K.BABU, AGED 64 YEARS, S/o K.K KUMARAN, PRESENTLY WORKING AS MINISTER FOR FISHERIES, PORTS AND EXCISE, RESIDING AT "KAVERI", NO.6, EASTERN SIDE OF CONTONMENT HOUSE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM AND HAVING PERMANENT ADDRESS AT KANNUPARAMBATH HOUSE, SANSKRIT COLLEGE ROAD, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682301.

2 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM ADDL.R3 DIRECTOR OF VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, TRIVANDRUM (ADDITIONAL 3rd RESPONDENT IS SUO MOTU IMPLEADED AS PER

ORDER DATED 10.03.2021 IN Crl.M.C.No.6051/15)

R1 BY ADVS. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.P.S.SYAMKUTTAN BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.N.PRABHAKARAN THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C.No.6051 of 2015 2

ORDER

When the matter came up for hearing today, an application was submitted by both the parties in Crl.M.A.No.1/2023 wherein both the parties settled the matter amicably. The prayer in the application is not for compounding the offence, but it is stated that they are not intending to proceed with the present case. At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that it is due to an inadvertent mistake and they may be permitted to agitate the matter before the trial court by filing proper compounding application. Without prejudice to the said right, the present Crl.M.C. will stand dismissed. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/- Crl.M.C.No.6051 of 2015 3 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 6051/2015 PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COMPLAINT IN CC NO JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, ERNAKULAM ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE LAWYER'S NOTICE ISSUED TO THE ACCUSED ON BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINANT ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE DATED 16/4/2015 // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2024 Same Parties Biju Ramesh vs K.BABU Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Somarajan