Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Usman vs Authorised Officer

USMAN vs Authorised Officer

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 11, 2024
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1289985

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/6613/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

USMAN

Respondent

Authorised Officer

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice n.nagaresh monday, the 11th day of march 2024 / 21st phalguna, 1945 wp(c) no. 6613 of 2020 petitioner: usman, aged 49 years, s/o. khadar, veetilavalappil house, parur desom, punnayoorkkulam village, chavakkad taluk, thrissur 679 561 by advs. tony thomas (inchiparambil) sri.k.abdul hakeem respondents: 1 authorised officer, head office, sahakarana sathabdi mandiram, tuda road, thiruvambady, kovilakathumpadam, pin-680 022 2 branch manager, (vadakkekad branch) al noor complex, edakkara road, mukkilapeedika, vadakkekad p.o, pin 679 562 by adv. sri.p.c.sasidharan, sc this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 11.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.p.(c) no.6613/2020 :2:judgmentdated this the 11th day of march, 2024 the counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- n. nagaresh judge sr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 6613 OF 2020 PETITIONER: USMAN, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O. KHADAR, VEETILAVALAPPIL HOUSE, PARUR DESOM, PUNNAYOORKKULAM VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR 679 561 BY ADVS. TONY THOMAS (INCHIPARAMBIL) SRI.K.ABDUL HAKEEM RESPONDENTS: 1 AUTHORISED OFFICER, HEAD OFFICE, SAHAKARANA SATHABDI MANDIRAM, TUDA ROAD, THIRUVAMBADY, KOVILAKATHUMPADAM, PIN-680 022 2 BRANCH MANAGER, (VADAKKEKAD BRANCH) AL NOOR COMPLEX, EDAKKARA ROAD, MUKKILAPEEDIKA, VADAKKEKAD P.O, PIN 679 562 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.P.(C) No.6613/2020 :2:

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of March, 2024 The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- N. NAGARESH JUDGE SR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial