Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

A Pradeep Kumar vs the State of Kerala

A Pradeep Kumar vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 30, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1289610

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/1620/2017
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

A Pradeep Kumar

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.v.kunhikrishnan tuesday, the 30th day of july 2024 / 8th sravana, 1946 crl.mc no. 1620 of 2017 crime no.650/2012 of cbcid, kozhikode, kozhikode against the order/judgment dated 09.03.2016 in cmp no.12743 of 2015 of judicial magistrate of first class -i,hosdrug petitioner/accused: a pradeep kumar aged 33 years, residing at mullachery house, klayi, kodom village, vellarikundu taluk, kasaragod district. by adv sri.t.madhu respondents/state:1 the state of kerala through the station house officer, hosdurg police station, kasaragod district, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam -682 031. 2 inspector of police cbcid, kozhikode, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam -682 031. 3 the regional passport officer kozhikode - 673 001. by adv sri.suvin r.menon, cgc other present: sri.sangeetharaj.n.r, pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 30.07.2024, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.m.c. no.1620 of 2017 2p.v.kunhikrishnan, j.---------------------------------- crl.m.c. no.1620 of 2017 ----------------------------------------------------- dated this the 30th day of july, 2024orderwhen this criminal miscellaneous case came up for consideration,15 the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers in this case is infructuous. therefore, this criminal miscellaneous case is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- p.v.kunhikrishnan judge ana

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 CRL.MC NO. 1620 OF 2017 CRIME NO.650/2012 OF CBCID, KOZHIKODE, Kozhikode AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 09.03.2016 IN CMP NO.12743 OF 2015 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -I,HOSDRUG PETITIONER/ACCUSED: A PRADEEP KUMAR AGED 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT MULLACHERY HOUSE, KLAYI, KODOM VILLAGE, VELLARIKUNDU TALUK, KASARAGOD DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.T.MADHU RESPONDENTS/STATE:

1 THE STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, HOSDURG POLICE STATION, KASARAGOD DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM -682 031. 2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBCID, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM -682 031. 3 THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER KOZHIKODE - 673 001. BY ADV SRI.SUVIN R.MENON, CGC OTHER PRESENT: SRI.SANGEETHARAJ.N.R, PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Crl.M.C. No.1620 of 2017 2

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

---------------------------------- Crl.M.C. No.1620 of 2017 ----------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2024

ORDER

When this criminal miscellaneous case came up for consideration,15 the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayers in this case is infructuous. Therefore, this criminal miscellaneous case is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE ANA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial