Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepu.D vs Union of India,

Deepu.D vs Union of India,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 25, 2024
~15 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1289315

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (CAT)/69/2019
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepu.D

Respondent

Union of India,

Excerpt

.....21.12.2018 of the 2ndrespondent inviting application for the post of canteen attendant respondent exhibits exhibit r1 true copy of the om no.12011/3/2015-sect.i dated 20.2.2016 -:13:- appendix of op (cat) 74/2019 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of o.a.no.101/2019. annexure-a 14: true copy of the judgment dated 13.02.2018 of the honourable supreme court. annexure-a 13: true copy of the order dated 29.01.2018 of the honourable supreme court. annexure-a 12: true copy of the order dated 19.01.2018 of the honourable supreme court. annexure-a 11: true copy of the application without enclosures submitted by the applicant. aannexure -a 10: true copy of letter dated 21.12.2018 of the 2nd respondent inviting application for the post of cook. annexure-a 9: true copy of the postal cover sent by the 2nd respondent. annexure-a 8: true copy of letter dated 21.12.2018 of the 2nd respondent inviting application for the post of canteen attendant. annexure- a 7: true copy of the letter dated 16.05.2013 of the 2nd respondent. annexure-a 6: true copy of the letter dated 09.01.2013 of the 2nd respondent. annexure-a 5: true copy of the letter dated 26.11.2012 of the 2nd respondent. annexure- a 4: true copy of letter dated 11.01.2012 of the 2nd respondent. annexure- a3: true copy of the letter dated 16.11.2011 of the 2nd respondent. annexure-a 2: true copy of the reply dated 30.12.2010 of the 2nd respondent. annexure-a1: true copy of the letter dated 12.12.2008 of the 2nd respondent. exhibit p2 true copy of the order dated 11.2.2019 in -:14:- appendix of op (cat) 74/2019 exhibit p3 true copy of the common order dated 5.11.2018 in o.a.no.180/00763/2018 and o.a.no.180/001021/2016 of cat, ernakulam. respondent exhibits exhibit r1(a) true copy of the minutes of the meeting dated 03.061970 had by dr.vikram sarabhai with pallithuraveli welfare association co-ordination committee. exhibit r1 b true copy of the judgment dated 13.02.2018 of the honourable court of india incivil appeal.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 5TH MAGHA, 1945 OP (CAT) NO. 108 OF 2014 AGAINST THE ORDER OA 948/2012 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH PETITIONER/S:

1 UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SPACE, ANTARIKSH BHAVAN, NEW BEL ROAD, BANGALORE - 560231. 2 VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CENTRE REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR, VSSC, ISRO P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 022. 3 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER RECRUITMENT VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CENTRE,ISRO P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 022. BY ADV SRI.TPM.IBRAHIM KHAN,SENIOR PANEL COUNSEL SHRI PRENJITH KUMAR, CGC

RESPONDENT/S: TREASA SEBASTIAN THAIVILAKOM HOUSE, VALIAVELI P.O., UNIT NO. 18,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS. SRI.A.V.LIYAH SRI.S.NARAYANAN NAIR SRI.V.R.PRASOBH THIS OP (CAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/1/2024 ALONG WITH OP (CAT).69/2019, 74/2019 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 25/1/2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:2:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 5TH MAGHA, 1945 OP (CAT) NO. 69 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER OA 763/2018 DT 5/11/2018 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH PETITIONER/S: DEEPU.D AGED 26 YEARS S/O DILEEP KUMAR, USHA BHAVAN, PUTHUVAL MANAKKAD, KULATHOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 583. BY ADV MARY BENJEMIN RESPONDENT/S:

1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SPACE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 110001. 2 THE VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CENTRE, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 022. 3 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, RECRUITMENT AND REVIEW SECTION, VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 022. BY ADVS. MANU S. DSG OF INDIA SHRI PRENJITH KUMAR, CGC

THIS OP (CAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.01.2024, ALONG WITH OP (CAT).108/2014 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 25/1/2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:3:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 5TH MAGHA, 1945 OP (CAT) NO. 74 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER OA 101/2019 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH PETITIONER/S: JALSON FERNANDEZ AGED 32 YEARS S/O.JACOB B., NIRMALA BHAVAN, ST.MARYS LANE, PALLITHURA.P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695586. BY ADV MARY BENJEMIN RESPONDENT/S:

1 VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CENTRE, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695586. 2 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, RECRUITMENT AND REVIEW SECTION, VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CENTRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695022. BY ADVS. MANU S. DSG OF INDIA SHRI PRENJITH KUMAR, CGC THIS OP (CAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.01.2024, ALONG WITH OP (CAT).108/2014 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 25/1/2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:4:-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 5TH MAGHA, 1945 OP (CAT) NO. 89 OF 2019 AGAINST THE ORDER OA 1021/2016 OF CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM PETITIONER/S: 1 RENJITH STEPHEN AGED 39 YEARS S/O. STEPHEN ROZARIO, HOUSE NO. 131 PALLITHURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 586. 2 MRS. JOSPIN, AGED 39 YEARS W/O. BEN JOSEPH, THYVILAGAM HOUSE, PALLITHURA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 586. 3 MR. ANTONY GILBERT, AGED 34 YEARS S/O. GILBDERT, PUTHUVALPURAYIDAM, PALLITHARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 586. BY ADV MARY BENJEMIN RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 2 HEAD PERSONNEL AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, VIKRAM SARABHAI SPACE CETNRE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 022. BY ADV SRI.PRENJITH KUMAR., CGC GIREESH KUMAR V., CGC THIS OP (CAT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18.01.2024, ALONG WITH OP (CAT).108/2014 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON 25/1/2024 DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -:5:- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE & SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ. ----------------------------------------- O.P.(CAT) Nos.108/2014, 69/2019, 74/2019 & 89/2019 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of January, 2024

JUDGMENT

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

These matters are related to claim for appointments in the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC), for the category of persons whose properties were acquired for establishment of VSSC.

2. Late Vikram A.Sarabhai was the Chairman of the Indian

Space Research Organisation in the year 1970.                          In year 1970,
land     was    acquired     for    VSSC       in   Veli     and    Pallithura     in
Thiruvananthapuram District.               As seen from the minutes of the
meeting       held   on   3/6/1970,   consensus        was       arrived   with    the

evictees of the land taken over for establishment of VSSC to give special consideration of evicted persons including their descendants falling within three generations, for employment in -:6:- VSSC. It is specified that qualified persons from among the evicted families will be given special consideration and preference, while recruiting candidates for appointment in VSSC and, this will be subject to recommendation of appropriate Selection Committee. That means, those who are qualified in accordance with the recruitment rules will have preference in the matter of employment. It was specifically agreed in the meeting that special consideration will be given only to those who are having acceptable qualification.

3. The original petitions are filed by applicants before the Tribunal. Their claim for appointment under the evictee category was negatived by the Tribunal.

4. In O.P.(CAT).No.108/2014, Union of India and VSSC challenge an order of the Tribunal allowing an application made

by     the     applicant      against      rejection    of    her    claim   for
appointment.       The applicant namely, Treasa Sebastian approached
the Tribunal on denial of appointment.                 Her claim is that the
land    belonging        to   her    predecessor-in-interest        Mr.Francisca

Fernandez was acquired for VSSC and that she is eligible under the scheme. She has passed Plus II and was 29 years old when -:7:-

she applied for appointment in VSSC.                 Her claim was rejected
citing over aged.         The qualification possessed by her only
makes her eligible for the erstwhile Group-D posts.                  The age
limit    fixed   for    such   posts      was   25   years.   Even   if   age

relaxation of three years is given to her, as she belongs to backward community, she cannot be considered as she had crossed the age limit. However, Tribunal found that she could claim for the post only after establishing that she was the legal heir of Francisca Fernandes through a civil suit and therefore, delay was occasioned.

5. We note that there is no dispute to the fact that age limit was 25 years which is relaxable by three years for backward community under OBC category. When she applied for

the post, she had crossed the age limit. It may be true that through civil suit she could claim as a legal heir and the delay might have occasioned due to delay in those proceedings. However, nothing prevented her from applying within time. The Tribunal could not have ordered appointment violating rules regarding age limit for such appointment. Therefore, we are of -:8:- the view that the impugned order has to be set aside and O.P. (CAT).No.108/2014 has to be allowed.

6. The petitioner in O.P.(CAT).No.69/2019, Shri Deepu D. submits that his mother Smt.S.Ushakumari is the daughter of Shri V.Sadanandan and Sadanandan’s land was acquired for VSSC and that his mother was not given employment. The Tribunal found that the applicant was considered multiple times for

appointment       to    the    posts    of    Catering        Attendant-A       (twice),
Fireman-A     and       Cook    (twice);          and    in    regard     to    Catering
Attendant-A,       he    did    not     qualify         in   interview;    as   against

Fireman-A, he was not found fit in the medical test; and for the post of cook, he did not respond to the intimation given. If the petitioner was found unfit by the Medical Board and also not qualified by the Selection Committee, the petitioner cannot get any benefit. Therefore, this original petition has to be dismissed.

7. In the matter of O.P.(CAT).No.89/2019, the

petitioners are three in number. They pressed their claim for third time. On all occasions, their claim were considered for different Group-D posts of Office Attendant-A, Safaiwala-A and -:9:- Fireman-A, but they were found not successful. It is to be noted that during the selection process, some other persons had to be selected from other categories, two among the three petitioners were found over aged and the other was found not

qualified.    Tribunal found that there was a ban in recruiting
fresh candidates.    It appears that presently a contractor has
been engaged to provide services.       Anyway, we do not find any
reason to interfere in these matters.     The original petition is

only to be dismissed.

8. In the matter relating to O.P.(CAT).No.74/2019, the

Tribunal, by the Ext.P2 order in O.A.No.101/2019 found that on similar set of facts and circumstances, the claims of the applicants in O.A.No.1021/2016 and O.A.No.763/2018, who are the

petitioners in O.P.(CAT).89/2019 and O.P.(CAT).No.69/2019 respectively were dismissed by the Tribunal, and therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the claim of the petitioner herein. We are of the view that, it cannot be reopened by another original petition. Therefore, this original petition is liable to be dismissed. -:10:-

9. Accordingly, we order that O.P.(CAT).No.108/2014 is allowed setting aside the impugned order; and O.P. (CAT).Nos.69/2019, 74/2019 and 89/2019 are dismissed in the light of the above observations.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE Sd/- SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JUDGE ms -:11:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 69/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF OA NO 180/00763/2018 ANNEXURE A12: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.02.2018 OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.1877/18. ANNEXURE A11: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2018 OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT. ANNEXURE A10: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.01.2018 OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT. ANNEXURE A9: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY M/S.ABHI ENTERPRISES. ANNEXURE 8: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT IN PURSUANT OF THE ADVERTISEMENT DATED 07.07.2012 ALONG WITH THE ADVERTISEMENT. ANNEXURE A7: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE TAHASILDAR, TRIVANDRUM. ANNEXURE A6: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO SHRI.V.SADANDAN. ANNEXURE A5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY OF THE APPLICANT DATED 29.07.2011. ANNEXURE A4: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY OF THE APPLICANT DATED 28.02.2011. ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER OF THE APPLICANT DATED 27.12.2010. ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.VSSC/RMT/9.0/35 DATED 17.01.1995. ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENSUAL REDUCED TO A MINUTE. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN OA 180/00763/2018 ANNEXURE R3: A COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.11.2017 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. ANNEXURE R2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.03.2008 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA. -:12:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 69/2019 ANNEXURE R1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23.11.2004 BY THE HON'BLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH.

EXHIBIT P3            TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.11.2018 IN OA NO
EXHIBIT P4            TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.7.2017 IN OP(CAT) NO
EXHIBIT P5            TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 21.12.2018 OF THE 2ND

RESPONDENT INVITING APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF CANTEEN ATTENDANT RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R1 TRUE COPY OF THE OM NO.12011/3/2015-SECT.I DATED 20.2.2016 -:13:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 74/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF O.A.NO.101/2019. ANNEXURE-A 14: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.02.2018 OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT. ANNEXURE-A 13: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2018 OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT. ANNEXURE-A 12: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.01.2018 OF THE HONOURABLE SUPREME COURT. ANNEXURE-A 11: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION WITHOUT ENCLOSURES SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. AANNEXURE -A 10: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 21.12.2018 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT INVITING APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF COOK. ANNEXURE-A 9: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL COVER SENT BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-A 8: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 21.12.2018 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT INVITING APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF CANTEEN ATTENDANT. ANNEXURE- A 7: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.05.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-A 6: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 09.01.2013 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-A 5: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 26.11.2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE- A 4: TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 11.01.2012 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE- A3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 16.11.2011 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-A 2: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 30.12.2010 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE-A1: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 12.12.2008 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 11.2.2019 IN -:14:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 74/2019 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMON ORDER DATED 5.11.2018 IN O.A.NO.180/00763/2018 AND O.A.NO.180/001021/2016 OF CAT, ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED 03.061970 HAD BY DR.VIKRAM SARABHAI WITH PALLITHURAVELI WELFARE ASSOCIATION CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE. EXHIBIT R1 B TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.02.2018 OF THE HONOURABLE COURT OF INDIA INCIVIL APPEAL NO. 1877/2018 -:15:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 89/2019 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF O.A. NO. 180/001021/2016. ANNEXURE A16 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 1.11.2016 IN OP (CAT) NO.110/2016. ANNEXURE A15 TRUE COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DATED 20.05.2016 FILED IN OP (CAT) NO.110 OF 2016 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT. ANNEXURE A14 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 06.01.2016 OF THE TRIBUNAL. ANNEXURE A13 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY RESPONDENTS IN M.A.NO.612016. ANNEXURE A12 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY RESPONDENTS IN M.A.NO.1197/2015. ANNEXURE A 11 LIST OF CANDIDATES APPOINTED TO THE POST OF FIREMAN -A AND CATERING ATTENDANT-A. ANNEXURE A10 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 26.10.2015 ISSUED TO THE 2ND APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A9 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 26.10.2015 ISSUED TO THE 2ND APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A8 TRUE COPY OF THE OPTION STATEMENT DATED 8.7.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A7 TRUE COPY OF THE OPTION STATEMENT DATED 8.7.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A6 TRUE COPY OF THE OPTION STATEMENT DATED 8.7.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A5 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.06.2015 IN O.A.NO.1002/2013. ANNEXURE A4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2013, ISSUED TO THE 3RD APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2013, ISSUED TO THE 2ND APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 26.08.2013, ISSUED TO THE 1ST APPLICANT BY THE RESPONDENT. -:16:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 89/2019 ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.6.2013 IN O.A.515/2012. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT IN O.A. 180/001021/2016. ANNEXURE R3 TRUE COPY OF THE ISRO HQ OM NO.HQ:ADMN:A20 (2):2011 DT.08.08.2011. ANNEXURE R2 TRUE COPY OF THE OM NO.2/8/2001-PIE DT.16.05.2001. ANNEXURE R1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.VSSC/RMT/9.0/2015 DT.26.10.15. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.11.2018 IN O.A. NO. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 21.12.2018 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT INVITING APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF CATERING ATTENDANT A ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 21.12.2018 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT INVITING APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF COOK ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 21.12.2018 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT INVITING APPLICATION FOR THE POST OF CATERING ATTENDANT A ISSUED TO THE 3RD PETITIONER. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING DATED

03.06.1970 HAD BY DR.VIKRAM SARABHAI WITH PALLITHURAVELI WELFARE ASSOCIATION CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE.

EXHIBIT R1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.02.2018 OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. EXHIBIT R1(c) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.03.2008 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.8285 OF 2005. PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit R1(d) TRUE COPY OF OM NO.12011/3/2015-SECT.I DATED 20.02.2016 -:17:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 108/2014 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A1 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.LA-2-13/09/C1/09 DATED 18/08/2009 FROM THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ANNEXURE A2 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO.A6-35486/09/K.DIS. DATED 08/12/2009 ISSUED FROM THE TAHSILDAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ANNEXURE A3 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE CONSENT AFFIDAVIT DATED APPLICANT. ANNEXURE A4 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE CONSENT AFFIDAVIT DATED APPLICANT.

ANNEXURE A5            A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED
ANNEXURE A6            A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED
ANNEXURE A7            A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED
ANNEXURE R-1           TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.HPGA/RMT/9.0/2011 DATED
ANNEXURE R-2           TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE C.A.T.ERNAKULAM BENCH

DATED 23/11/2004 IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.589 OF 2002. ANNEXURE R-3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 03/03/2008 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.8285 OF 2005. EXHIBIT P1 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.948 OF

2012 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT/APPLICANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH. EXHIBIT P2 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.948 OF 2012 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. -:18:- APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 108/2014 EXHIBIT P3 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REJOINDER FILED BY THE RESPONDENT/APPLICANT IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.948 OF 2012 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE C.A.T., ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT P4 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL REPLY AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.948 OF 2012 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE C.A.T. ERNAKULAM BENCH.

EXHIBIT P5 A PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19/11/2013 IN ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.948 OF 2012 PASSED BY THE C.A.T. ERNAKULAM. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT R(A) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 22.3.13 SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PIO ISRO SEEKING INFORMATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS MADE UNDER EVICTEE STATUS. EXHIBIT R(B) TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER NO.CP 1O: DOS :RTI:2013:2998 DATED 2.7.2013 FROM CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER ISRO HEAD QUARTERS IN REPLY TO R(A).

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial