Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Velappan vs State of Kerala

Velappan vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 31, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1289159

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/1061/2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Velappan

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....sri.m.j.polly respondent/complainant: state of kerala rep. by inspector of police, kunnamkulam, public prosecutor, high court of kerala at ernakulam. pushpalatha m.k (senior government pleader) this criminal appeal having been finally heard on 31.07.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:p.g ajithkumar, j.===================== crl.appeal no. 1061 of 2016 ========================= dated this the 31st day of july, 2024.judgmentthis is an appeal against conviction. the appellant was convicted and sentenced for the offences under section 376 (2) of the indian penal code, 1860 and section 5(l) and 5(m) r/w 6 of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 (for short, ‘the po cso act’).2. the learned public prosecutor placed on record a copy of the death certificate of the appellant. he expired on 16.03.2018.3. the sentence imposed on the appellant comprisesfine also. therefore, the appeal would not abate as a matter of course. as stated, the appellant expired on 16.03.2018. nobody has come forward to prosecute the appeal yet. in the circumstances, the appeal is liable to be closed as held in pazhani vs. state of kerala [2017 (1) klt 341]. accordingly, this appeal is closed and the records are consigned to therecord room. the trial court may take steps for realisation of the fine amount from the estate of the appellant, if any. send a copy of this order along with the copy of the impugned judgment to the kerala state legal services authority (ke lsa) for taking appropriate action in regard to the order to pay compensation to the victim under the victim compensation scheme. sd/- p.g. ajithkumar, judge jj

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF JULY 2024 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1946 CRL.A NO. 1061 OF 2016 CRIME NO.1630/2015 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.08.2016 IN SC NO.805 OF 2015 OF I ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT, THRISSUR. APPELLANT/ACCUSED: VELAPPAN, AGED 69 YEARS, S/O. KONNAN, PULIKKAL HOUSE, PUTHUSSERY DESOM, KANIPAYYUR VILLAGE, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR DTISTRICT, KERALA. SRI.M.J.POLLY RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: STATE OF KERALA REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNNAMKULAM, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. PUSHPALATHA M.K (SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER) THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.G AJITHKUMAR, J.

===================== Crl.Appeal No. 1061 of 2016 ========================= Dated this the 31st day of July, 2024.

JUDGMENT

This is an appeal against conviction. The appellant was convicted and sentenced for the offences under Section 376 (2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 5(l) and 5(m) r/w 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, ‘the Po CSO Act’).

2. The learned Public Prosecutor placed on record a copy of the death certificate of the appellant. He expired on 16.03.2018.

3. The sentence imposed on the appellant comprises

fine also. Therefore, the appeal would not abate as a matter of course. As stated, the appellant expired on 16.03.2018. Nobody has come forward to prosecute the appeal yet. In the circumstances, the appeal is liable to be closed as held in Pazhani Vs. State of Kerala [2017 (1) KLT 341]. Accordingly, this appeal is closed and the records are consigned to the

record room. The trial court may take steps for realisation of the fine amount from the estate of the appellant, if any. Send a copy of this order along with the copy of the impugned judgment to the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (Ke LSA) for taking appropriate action in regard to the order to pay compensation to the victim under the Victim Compensation Scheme. Sd/- P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE JJ

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial