Sudha vs T.P.Senkumar Ips

SUDHA vs T.P.Senkumar Ips

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 18, 2024

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1288347

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1288347
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Nias C.P.
Decided On: Jul 18, 2024
Case Number: Con.Case(C)/794/2009
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

SUDHA

Respondent

T.P.Senkumar Ips

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice mohammed nias c.p. thursday, the 18th day of july 2024 / 27th ashadha, 1946 con.case(c) no. 794 of 2009 against the order/judgment dated 28.03.2008 in wpc no.9302 of 2008 of high court of keralapetitioners: 1 sudha, w/o. late sundaresan, aged 53 years, pushpa mandiram, nedumancavu po., kareepra village, kottarakkara., 2 suja, d/o. late sundaresan, aged 21 pushpa mandiram, nedumancavu po, 3 sujith s/o.late sundaresan, aged 19 pushpa mandiram, nedumancavue po, by adv sri.n.sasidharan unnithan respondent: t.p.senkumar ips (aged about 48 years , s/o.prabhakaran), managing director, kerala state road transport corporation,, thiruvananthapuram.by adv shri.johnson p.john, sc, ksrtc other present: sri.akhil suresh, sc this contempt of court case (civil) having come up for admission on 18.07.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -2coc 794 of 2009mohammed nias c.p., j.----------------------------------------------- contempt of court case (civil) no.794 of 2009 --------------------------------------------- dated this the 18th day of july, 2024judgmentthis contempt of court case has been pending before this court for so many years without even being listed before the bench concerned since 2009. under such circumstances, i feel justified in presuming that nothing survives for consideration in this case. accordingly, this case is closed as infructuous. if the cause of action as alleged in the petition still survives, it shall be open to the parties concerned to file an application seeking restoration. subject to the above, this contempt case is closed as infructous. sd/- mohammed nias c.p. judge dlk/24.7.2024

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 27TH ASHADHA, 1946 CON.CASE(C) NO. 794 OF 2009 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 28.03.2008 IN WPC NO.9302 OF 2008 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS: 1 SUDHA, W/O. LATE SUNDARESAN, AGED 53 YEARS, PUSHPA MANDIRAM, NEDUMANCAVU PO., KAREEPRA VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA., 2 SUJA, D/O. LATE SUNDARESAN, AGED 21 PUSHPA MANDIRAM, NEDUMANCAVU PO, 3 SUJITH S/O.LATE SUNDARESAN, AGED 19 PUSHPA MANDIRAM, NEDUMANCAVUE PO, BY ADV SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENT: T.P.SENKUMAR IPS (AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS , S/O.PRABHAKARAN), MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV SHRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC OTHER PRESENT: SRI.AKHIL SURESH, SC THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -2COC 794 of 2009

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.

----------------------------------------------- Contempt of Court Case (Civil) No.794 of 2009 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of July, 2024

JUDGMENT

This Contempt of Court Case has been pending before this Court for so many years without even being listed before the Bench concerned since 2009. Under such circumstances, I feel justified in presuming that nothing survives for consideration in this case. Accordingly, this case is closed as infructuous. If the cause of action as alleged in the petition still survives, it shall be open to the parties concerned to file an application seeking restoration. Subject to the above, this contempt case is closed as infructous. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE dlk/24.7.2024

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2024 Same Parties SUDHA vs T.P.Senkumar Ips Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Nias C.P.