Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Martin, vs State of Kerala

Martin, vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 12, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1285837

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/1352/2024
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Martin,

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....sr.gp.k.amminikutty this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 12.01.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthe petitioners are the titleholders in possession of 15.50 ares of land in survey nos. 85/13-1, 85/14-1, chelamattom village, kunnathnadu taluk, ernakulam district. they have approached this court seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent/revenue divisional officer to consider and pass orders on ext.p4 and p5, form-6 applications filed under the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland rules, 2008.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitionersand the learned government pleader. in the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration that ext.p4 and p5 are statutory applications, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent/rdo to consider and pass orders on ext.p4 and p5 applications, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. sd/- murali purushothaman bnu judge appendix petitioners exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the order date 27-3-2015 of the 3rd respondent revenue divisional officer, moovattupuzha exhibit p2 true copy of the letter dated 19-3-2019 of the secretary, okkal grama panchayat exhibit p3 true copy of the judgment dated 27-1-2021 in w.p.(c) no. 11563 of 2019 exhibit p4 true copy of the form 6 application dated 2-1-2024 submitted by the 1st petitioner exhibit p5 true copy of the form 6 application dated 2-1-2024 submitted by the 2nd petitioner

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 22ND POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 1352 OF 2024 PETITIONER: 1 MARTIN, AGED 58 YEARS SON OF PAILY, ALAKKADAN HOUSE, OKKAL P.O., 2 JANCY AGED 50 YEARS W/O.MARTIN, ALAKKADAN HOUSE, OKKAL P.O., BY ADV K.P.SANTHI RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030 3 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER , MOOVATTUPUZHA, PIN - 686673 4 THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM, PIN - OTHER PRESENT: SR.GP.K.AMMINIKUTTY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.01.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioners are the titleholders in possession of 15.50 ares of land in Survey Nos. 85/13-1, 85/14-1, Chelamattom Village, Kunnathnadu Taluk, Ernakulam District. They have approached this Court seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 and P5, Form-6 applications filed under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners

and the learned Government Pleader. In the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into consideration that Ext.P4 and P5 are statutory applications, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 3rd respondent/RDO to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 and P5 applications, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN bnu JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATE 27-3-2015 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MOOVATTUPUZHA Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19-3-2019 OF THE SECRETARY, OKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 27-1-2021 IN W.P.(C) NO. 11563 OF 2019 Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 APPLICATION DATED 2-1-2024 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit P5 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 6 APPLICATION DATED 2-1-2024 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial