Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sindhu vs Safeer.T.V,

Sindhu vs Safeer.T.V,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 11, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1283969

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/5/2024
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sindhu

Respondent

Safeer.T.V,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice c.s. sudha thursday, the 11th day of april 2024 / 22nd chaithra, 1946 against the order/judgment dated 10.09.2021 in opmv no.2061 of 2019 of motor accident claims tribunal, kozhikode appellants/claimants:1 sindhu aged 47 years w/o late.balakrishnan, residing at akkachola, p.o.pappinipara, anakkayam village, pookkottur, mariyad, malappuram district, pin - 676122 2 anju.k.p aged 28 years w/o sreekanth.t.k, residing at arunolichalil, p.o.kunnamanagalam, kozhikode, pin - 673571 3 ajith kumar.k.p 4 aneesh kumar.k.p aged 25 years 5 anil kumar aged 22 years 6 abhinav kumar.k.p aged 19 years by adv k.v.rashmirespondents/respondents: 1 safeer.t.v, s/o mammu, residing at edathodithazhekuniyil, p.o.kadavathoor, thalassery, pin - 670676 2 muhammed ajma.t.k s/o muhamood, residing at thaikkandiyil, p.o.chendayad, panoor, thalassery, pin - 670692 this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 11.04.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:c.s.sudha, j.-------------------------------------------------------------- maca no.5 of 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- dated this the 11th day of april, 2024judgmentthe learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not pressed. memo to the said effect is filed. hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. sd/- c.s.sudha judge np

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 10.09.2021 IN OPMV NO.2061 OF 2019 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE APPELLANTS/CLAIMANTS:

1 SINDHU AGED 47 YEARS W/O LATE.BALAKRISHNAN, RESIDING AT AKKACHOLA, P.O.PAPPINIPARA, ANAKKAYAM VILLAGE, POOKKOTTUR, MARIYAD, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676122 2 ANJU.K.P AGED 28 YEARS W/O SREEKANTH.T.K, RESIDING AT ARUNOLICHALIL, P.O.KUNNAMANAGALAM, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673571 3 AJITH KUMAR.K.P 4 ANEESH KUMAR.K.P AGED 25 YEARS 5 ANIL KUMAR AGED 22 YEARS 6 ABHINAV KUMAR.K.P AGED 19 YEARS BY ADV K.V.RASHMI

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 SAFEER.T.V, S/O MAMMU, RESIDING AT EDATHODITHAZHEKUNIYIL, P.O.KADAVATHOOR, THALASSERY, PIN - 670676 2 MUHAMMED AJMA.T.K S/O MUHAMOOD, RESIDING AT THAIKKANDIYIL, P.O.CHENDAYAD, PANOOR, THALASSERY, PIN - 670692 THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.S.SUDHA, J.

-------------------------------------------------------------- MACA No.5 of 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 11th day of April, 2024

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not pressed. Memo to the said effect is filed. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- C.S.SUDHA JUDGE NP

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial