Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sumayya vs the State of Kerala

Sumayya vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 25, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1283749

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
LA.App./114/2024
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumayya

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

la.app. no. 114 of 2024 1 2025:ker:25443in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice a.k.jayasankaran nambiar & the honourable mr. justice easwaran s. tuesday, the 25th day of march 2025 / 4th chaithra, 1947 la.app. no. 114 of 2024 against the judgment dated 22.01.2016 in lar no.219 of 2011 of sub court,attingal appellant/claimant: sumayya aged 37 years d/o jalaludheen m.k.a., residing at shyma nivas, vadakkumbhagom, kazhakuttam p.o., thiruvananthapuram -695882 by adv a.chandra babu respondents/respondents: 1 the state of kerala represented by the district collector, civil station, kudappanakkunnu, thiruvananthapuram -6950432 the chief executive officer electronics technology, techno park, thiruvananthapuram 695581 by senior government pleader sri.t.k.shajahan-r1 smt.k.v.resmi,sc -r2 this land acquisition appeal having been finally heard on 25.03.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: la.app. no. 114 of 2024 2 2025:ker:25443judgmentdr. a.k.jayasankaran nambiar, j.despite the specific undertaking given by the learned counsel for the appellant on 20.03.2025 that the balance court fee would be paid on or before 25.03.2025, when the case was taken up today, we are informed that the balance court fee has not been paid. under the said circumstances, we see no reason to accommodate the appellant herein. the land acquisition appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. dr. a.k.jayasankaran nambiar easwaran s. mns

Full Judgment

LA.APP. NO. 114 OF 2024 1 2025:KER:25443

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947 LA.APP. NO. 114 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 22.01.2016 IN LAR NO.219 OF 2011 OF SUB COURT,ATTINGAL APPELLANT/CLAIMANT: SUMAYYA AGED 37 YEARS D/O JALALUDHEEN M.K.A., RESIDING AT SHYMA NIVAS, VADAKKUMBHAGOM, KAZHAKUTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695882 BY ADV A.CHANDRA BABU RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695043

2 THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY, TECHNO PARK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695581 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.K.SHAJAHAN-R1 SMT.K.V.RESMI,SC -R2 THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: LA.APP. NO. 114 OF 2024 2 2025:KER:25443

JUDGMENT

Dr. A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.

Despite the specific undertaking given by the learned counsel for the appellant on 20.03.2025 that the balance court fee would be paid on or before 25.03.2025, when the case was taken up today, we are informed that the balance court fee has not been paid. Under the said circumstances, we see no reason to accommodate the appellant herein. The land Acquisition Appeal is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution. DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR EASWARAN S. mns

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial