Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sreejith vs State of Kerala

Sreejith vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 02, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1282992

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/9327/2019
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sreejith

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

-1-in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice g.girish wednesday, the 2nd day of april 2025 / 12th chaithra, 1947 crl.mc no. 9327 of 2019 crime no.210/2019 of perumpadappu police station, malappuram petitioner/s:sreejith aged 42 years, s/o. appunni, thamarassery (h), maranchery p.o. amsham desom, ponnani taluk, malappuram district. s.rajeev sri.k.k.dheerendrakrishnan sri.v.vinay sri.d.feroze sri.k.anand (a-1921) respondents: 1 state of kerala rep. by public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam 682 031, (crime no. 210/2019 of perumpadappu, police station, malappuram district). 2 soma varma, secretary, maranchery, service cooperative bank, maranchery, perumpadapp, malappuram district 679 300. -2- addl.director general of prosecution sri.m.p.ashok kumar sri.p.c.gopinath smt.bindu sreedhar shri.asif n smt seetha s, sr pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 02.04.2025, the court on the same day passed the following: -3-g. girish, j.----------------------------- ----------------------------------------- dated this the 2nd day of april, 2025orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all challenges against the accusations before the trial court. permission is granted. accordingly, the crl.m.c. stands dismissed as withdrawn, leaving open the right of the petitioner to challenge the accusations against him before the trial court. sd/- g. girish judge ded

Full Judgment

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.GIRISH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CRL.MC NO. 9327 OF 2019 CRIME NO.210/2019 OF PERUMPADAPPU POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM PETITIONER/S:

SREEJITH AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. APPUNNI, THAMARASSERY (H), MARANCHERY P.O. AMSHAM DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. S.RAJEEV SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN SRI.V.VINAY SRI.D.FEROZE SRI.K.ANAND (A-1921) RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031, (CRIME NO. 210/2019 OF PERUMPADAPPU, POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT). 2 SOMA VARMA, SECRETARY, MARANCHERY, SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK, MARANCHERY, PERUMPADAPP, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT 679 300. -2- ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR SRI.P.C.GOPINATH SMT.BINDU SREEDHAR SHRI.ASIF N SMT SEETHA S, SR PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

G. GIRISH, J.

----------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 2nd day of April, 2025

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all challenges against the accusations before the Trial Court. Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Crl.M.C. stands dismissed as withdrawn, leaving open the right of the petitioner to challenge the accusations against him before the Trial Court. Sd/- G. GIRISH JUDGE ded

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial