Manoj Kumar vs Vineethamol

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 02, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1282510

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1282510
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath
Decided On: Apr 02, 2025
Case Number: RPFC/458/2018
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Kumar

Respondent

Vineethamol

Excerpt

rpfc no. 38 of 2016 against the order dated 30.09.2015 in mc no.161 of 2015 of family court, nedumangad revision petitioner/respondent: s/o podiyan, nisha bhavan, vettikavaler, kakkodu, kottarkkara, kollam district by adv sri.j.jayakumar vinithamol aged 32 years alanthara, nellanadu, venjarammoodu, thiruvananthapuram district,pin-695607. heard on 02.04.2025, along with rpfc.458/2018, the court rpfc no. 458 of 2018 against the order dated 31.07.2018 in mc no.476 of 2017 of family court, nedumangad revision petitioner/counter petitioner: aged 43 years s/o podiyan, vetikkavila nisha nivas, kaduvapara, kakkod p.o., kottarakkara, kollam district by adv j.jayakumar vineethamol aged 34 years alanthara, nellanadu, venjaramoodu, thiruvananthapuram district-695105 by advs.sri.v.suresh sri.g.sudheer heard on 02.04.2025, along with rpfc.38/2016, the courtorderit is submitted that the dispute has been settled between the parties and the petitioner does not want to proceed further with these revision petitions. accordingly, both the revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge kp

Full Judgment

RPFC NO. 38 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2015 IN MC NO.161 OF 2015 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: S/O PODIYAN, NISHA BHAVAN, VETTIKAVALER, KAKKODU, KOTTARKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV SRI.J.JAYAKUMAR VINITHAMOL AGED 32 YEARS ALANTHARA, NELLANADU, VENJARAMMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT,PIN-695607. HEARD ON 02.04.2025, ALONG WITH RPFC.458/2018, THE COURT RPFC NO. 458 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.07.2018 IN MC NO.476 OF 2017 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD REVISION PETITIONER/COUNTER PETITIONER: AGED 43 YEARS S/O PODIYAN, VETIKKAVILA NISHA NIVAS, KADUVAPARA, KAKKOD P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT BY ADV J.JAYAKUMAR VINEETHAMOL AGED 34 YEARS ALANTHARA, NELLANADU, VENJARAMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695105 BY ADVS.SRI.V.SURESH SRI.G.SUDHEER HEARD ON 02.04.2025, ALONG WITH RPFC.38/2016, THE COURT

ORDER

It is submitted that the dispute has been settled between the parties and the petitioner does not want to proceed further with these revision petitions. Accordingly, both the revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2025 Same Parties Manoj Kumar vs Vineethamol Same Subject Miscellaneous Same Judge Honourable Dr. Justice Kauser Edappagath

Miscellaneous family court Has been