Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Zareena, vs Commissioner,

Zareena, vs Commissioner,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 08, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1282150

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/4085/2017
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Zareena,

Respondent

Commissioner,

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice mohammed nias c.p. tuesday, the 8th day of april 2025 / 18th chaithra, 1947 petitioner: zareena, aged 35 years rose villa, near collectors bungalow, west hill, calicut. respondents: 1 commissioner, customs and central excise department, office of the commissioner of customs (prevention's) catholic center, broadway, kochi, pin-682 031. 2 the asst. commissioner of customs, (preventive) customs and preventive division, calicut, pin-673 0013 superintendent of customs, customs preventive division, calicut, pin-673 001. by adv sri.p.r.sreejith, sc, central board of excise and customs sri.sreelal warrier, sc this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 08.04.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: mohammed nias c.p., j w.p(c) no. 4085 of 2017 dated this the 8th day of april, 2025judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. this is recorded. therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. sd/- mohammed nias c.p. judge lu appendix of wp(c) 4085/2017 petitioner exhibits : exhibit p1 the true copy of the statement of the gold smith showing that the petitioner's ornaments leased by respondents officers. respondent exhibits : annexure r1(a) true copy of the statement of the petitioner recorded under section 108 of the customs act dated 28.05.2016. annexure r1(b) true cpy f the postal acknowledgment card dated 18.11.2016. // true copy // pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1947 PETITIONER: ZAREENA, AGED 35 YEARS ROSE VILLA, NEAR COLLECTORS BUNGALOW, WEST HILL, CALICUT. RESPONDENTS: 1 COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTION'S) CATHOLIC CENTER, BROADWAY, KOCHI, PIN-682 031. 2 THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, (PREVENTIVE) CUSTOMS AND PREVENTIVE DIVISION, CALICUT, PIN-673 001

3 SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS, CUSTOMS PREVENTIVE DIVISION, CALICUT, PIN-673 001. BY ADV SRI.P.R.SREEJITH, SC, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS SRI.SREELAL WARRIER, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J W.P(C) No. 4085 of 2017 Dated this the 8th day of April, 2025

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. This is recorded. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE LU APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4085/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS : EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE GOLD SMITH SHOWING THAT THE PETITIONER'S ORNAMENTS LEASED BY RESPONDENTS OFFICERS. RESPONDENT EXHIBITS : ANNEXURE R1(A) TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER RECORDED UNDER SECTION 108 OF THE CUSTOMS ACT DATED 28.05.2016. ANNEXURE R1(B) TRUE CPY F THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD DATED 18.11.2016. // True Copy // PA To Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial