Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sugathan vs Ambily

Sugathan vs Ambily

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 02, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281901

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/77/2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sugathan

Respondent

Ambily

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 2nd day of april 2025 / 12th chaithra, 1947 rpfc no. 77 of 2016 against the order dated 31.10.2015 in mc no.14 of 2013 of family court, kattappana revision petitioner/respondent:sugathan aged 43 years s/o.damodaran, kallarackal house, thovarayar po, kanchiyar village, idukki district, pin 685511 by adv sri.v.a.ajai kumar respondents/petitioners: 1 ambily, aged 39 years w/o.sugathan, mangalathu house, ambalakkavala, kattappana south po, idukki district, pin 685515 2 archana, aged 7 years d/o.sugathan, represented by her mother and natural guardian, ambily, w/o.sugathan, mangalathu house, ambalakkavala, kattappana south po, idukki district, pin 685515 this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 02.04.2025, the court on the same day passed the following:orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition is not pressed. hence, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge kp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RPFC NO. 77 OF 2016 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.10.2015 IN MC NO.14 OF 2013 OF FAMILY COURT, KATTAPPANA REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

SUGATHAN AGED 43 YEARS S/O.DAMODARAN, KALLARACKAL HOUSE, THOVARAYAR PO, KANCHIYAR VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685511 BY ADV SRI.V.A.AJAI KUMAR RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 AMBILY, AGED 39 YEARS W/O.SUGATHAN, MANGALATHU HOUSE, AMBALAKKAVALA, KATTAPPANA SOUTH PO, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685515 2 ARCHANA, AGED 7 YEARS D/O.SUGATHAN, REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, AMBILY, W/O.SUGATHAN, MANGALATHU HOUSE, AMBALAKKAVALA, KATTAPPANA SOUTH PO, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN 685515 THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition is not pressed. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial