Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Rahim vs Arifa Beevi

Abdul Rahim vs Arifa Beevi

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 02, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281858

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/372/2015
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Rahim

Respondent

Arifa Beevi

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 2nd day of april 2025 / 12th chaithra, 1947 rpfc no. 372 of 2015 against the order dated 23.07.2015 in mc no.504 of 2014 of family court, nedumangad revision petitioner/respondent: abdul rahim aged 54 years s/o.muhammed esmail, thadatharikathu veedu,pulimathu neduveli temple, pulimath now residingat muhammed manzil, palamoodu, kallara. by adv sri.n.muhammad saju respondent/petitioner: arifa beevi aged 51 years d/o.salma beevi, muhammed manzil, house no.335/vii,palamukku, kallara. by advs. shri.ajit g anjarlekar sri.govind padmanaabhan sri.g.p.shinod this rev.petition(family court) having been finally heard on 02.04.2025, the court on the same day passed the following:orderit is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute has been settled between the parties and the petitioner does not want to proceed further with this revision petition. hence, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge kp

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RPFC NO. 372 OF 2015 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23.07.2015 IN MC NO.504 OF 2014 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: ABDUL RAHIM AGED 54 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED ESMAIL, THADATHARIKATHU VEEDU,PULIMATHU NEDUVELI TEMPLE, PULIMATH NOW RESIDINGAT MUHAMMED MANZIL, PALAMOODU, KALLARA. BY ADV SRI.N.MUHAMMAD SAJU RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ARIFA BEEVI AGED 51 YEARS D/O.SALMA BEEVI, MUHAMMED MANZIL, HOUSE NO.335/VII,PALAMUKKU, KALLARA. BY ADVS. SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN SRI.G.P.SHINOD THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute has been settled between the parties and the petitioner does not want to proceed further with this revision petition. Hence, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE kp

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial